Department of Buccofacial Prostheses, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Feb;105(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60009-7.
Marginal fit is an important factor for the long-term success of ceramic restorations; however, it is difficult to compare results from studies on marginal accuracy of zirconium oxide-based restorations that used various computer-assisted systems, because different methods were used to obtain the data.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of different manufacturing techniques on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic copings.
An extracted mandibular first premolar was prepared for a complete coverage restoration and subsequently duplicated 40 times in a liquid crystal polymer (LCP). Ceramic copings (n=10) were fabricated on the LCP models using the following systems: glass-infiltrated zirconia-toughened alumina (In-Ceram Zirconia) and yttrium cation-doped tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (In-Ceram YZ, Cercon, and Procera Zirconia). The absolute marginal discrepancy of the cores was assessed by using an image analysis system. The data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Scheffé's test (α=.05).
The mean marginal openings were 29.98 ± 3.97 μm for the In-Ceram Zirconia group, 12.24 ± 3.08 μm for the In-Ceram YZ group, 13.15 ± 3.01 μm for the Cercon group, and 8.67 ± 3.96 μm for the Procera group. Significant differences were found among the 4 systems (P<.05).
The marginal accuracy achieved for the 4 zirconia-based ceramic crown systems analyzed was within the range of clinical acceptance (120 μm).
边缘适合性是陶瓷修复体长期成功的一个重要因素;然而,由于使用了不同的方法来获取数据,因此很难比较使用各种计算机辅助系统的氧化锆基修复体边缘精度的研究结果。
本研究的目的是分析不同制造技术对氧化锆陶瓷修复体边缘适应性的影响。
从下颌第一前磨牙中提取一个标本,预备用于全冠修复,并随后在液晶聚合物(LCP)中复制 40 次。使用以下系统在 LCP 模型上制作陶瓷修复体(n=10):玻璃渗透氧化锆增强氧化铝(In-Ceram Zirconia)和掺钇四方氧化锆多晶(In-Ceram YZ、Cercon 和 Procera Zirconia)。使用图像分析系统评估核的绝对边缘差异。使用单向方差分析和 Scheffé 检验(α=.05)对数据进行分析。
In-Ceram Zirconia 组的平均边缘开口为 29.98±3.97μm,In-Ceram YZ 组为 12.24±3.08μm,Cercon 组为 13.15±3.01μm,Procera 组为 8.67±3.96μm。4 种系统之间存在显著差异(P<.05)。
分析的 4 种氧化锆基陶瓷冠系统的边缘精度在临床可接受范围内(120μm)。