Department of Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University, Mubark Road, Kafr Abu Tabl, Kafrelsheikh Governorate, Kafrelsheikh, 33511, Egypt.
Department of Conservative, Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03687-4.
Many monolithic machined materials have been introduced and provided a suitable mechanical and physical properties for inlay restorations. However, there is shortage in the studies evaluating the marginal adaptation using these materials.
This study aimed to compare the effect of fabricating inlay restorations from 3 different CAD-CAM materials on marginal gaps before and after thermocycling.
Sixty human premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) according to the material used: (e.max CAD, Ivoclar AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein), (HC, Shofu, Koyoto, Japan) and (Brilliant Crios, Coltene, Altstätten, Switzerland) (n = 20). A scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JSM- 6510 lv, JEOL, Tokyo, JAPAN) was used to for measuring the marginal gaps after cementation of inlay restorations. The magnification was adapted to 250x. Marginal gaps were revaluated with SEM after thermocycling. The temperatures of baths were 5 and 55 °C was applied for a total of 5000 cycles. All data were statistically analyzed by using ANCOVA to demonstrate if there were any statistically significant differences between the gap measures after thermocycling of the three independent (unrelated) groups. A Bonferroni adjustmen was used to perform post hoc analysis (α = 0.05).
Post-intervention marginal gap was statistically significantly lower in group EX (110.8 μm) which was statistically significant compared with group SF (112.5 μm) (mean difference=-1.768, P = .007) and group BR (113 μm) (mean difference=-2.272, P = .001), however, in. comparing SF and BR groups, there was no significant difference (mean difference=-0.5, P = .770).
Thermocycling affected the marginal gaps of composite based restoration and resin-modified ceramics widely. However, it had a very small effect on glass ceramics marginal adaptation.
The marginal gaps of CAD-CAM inlays varied according to material used (ceramic based, combination, or resin based). Thermocycling has a minor effect on the marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic inlays, where it affected the margin of resin-modified ceramic and composite based inlays greatly. Using lithium disilicate glass-ceramic might improve the clinical longevity of inlay restored teeth.
已经有许多整体加工材料被引入并为嵌体修复提供了合适的机械和物理性能。然而,评估使用这些材料的边缘适应性的研究还比较缺乏。
本研究旨在比较使用 3 种不同 CAD-CAM 材料制作嵌体修复体前后热循环对边缘间隙的影响。
根据使用的材料,将 60 个人类前磨牙随机分为 3 组(n=20):(e.max CAD,Ivoclar AG,施塔恩,列支敦士登)、(HC,Shofu,京都,日本)和(Brilliant Crios,Coltene,阿尔特施塔特,瑞士)(n=20)。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)(JSM-6510lv,JEOL,东京,日本)测量嵌体修复体粘结后的边缘间隙。放大倍数适应 250x。热循环后,使用 SEM 重新评估边缘间隙。浴温为 5 和 55°C,共进行 5000 次循环。使用单因素方差分析(ANCOVA)对所有数据进行统计分析,以证明 3 个独立(无关)组之间热循环后间隙测量值是否存在统计学差异。使用 Bonferroni 调整进行事后分析(α=0.05)。
干预后,EX 组(110.8μm)的边缘间隙明显低于 SF 组(112.5μm)(平均差值=-1.768,P=0.007)和 BR 组(113μm)(平均差值=-2.272,P=0.001),差异有统计学意义,但 SF 组和 BR 组之间无明显差异(平均差值=0.5,P=0.770)。
热循环广泛影响复合基修复体和树脂改性陶瓷的边缘间隙。然而,它对玻璃陶瓷边缘适应性的影响很小。
CAD-CAM 嵌体的边缘间隙取决于所使用的材料(陶瓷基、组合或树脂基)。热循环对锂硅玻璃陶瓷嵌体的边缘适应性影响较小,而对树脂改性陶瓷和复合基嵌体的边缘影响较大。使用锂硅玻璃陶瓷可能会提高嵌体修复牙的临床寿命。