Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, National Women's Health, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Thromb Res. 2011 Feb;127 Suppl 3:S56-60. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(11)70016-0.
The choice of anticoagulant agent for pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves introduces a clinical dilemma for women and the clinicians caring for them. Options include continuing oral anticoagulants (OAC) such as warfarin throughout pregnancy, switching from warfarin to unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the first trimester then back to warfarin until close to delivery or taking unfractionated heparin or LMWH throughout pregnancy. The dilemma is that warfarin is the most effective a preventing maternal thromboembolic complications but causes significant fetal morbidity and mortality; unfractionated heparin and in particular LMWH have good fetal outcomes but the risk of thromboembolic complications is high. What is considered to be an "acceptable level" of risk to mother and infant may differ from one clinician to another and of equal importance, it may also differ from one woman to the next. An unbiased discussion of the pros and cons of each option is required to allow women to make and informed and confident choice in this very difficult clinical situation.
对于患有机械心脏瓣膜的孕妇选择抗凝药物,这给女性及其临床医生带来了临床困境。选择包括在整个孕期继续使用口服抗凝药物(OAC),如华法林;在孕早期从华法林转换为未分级肝素或低分子肝素(LMWH),然后在接近分娩时再转回华法林;或者在整个孕期使用未分级肝素或 LMWH。这种困境在于,华法林是预防产妇血栓栓塞并发症最有效的药物,但会导致胎儿严重的发病率和死亡率;未分级肝素,特别是 LMWH,对胎儿结局良好,但血栓栓塞并发症的风险很高。对于母亲和婴儿来说,被认为是“可接受”的风险水平可能因临床医生而异,同样重要的是,对于每个女性来说也可能不同。为了让女性在这种非常困难的临床情况下做出明智和自信的选择,需要对每种选择的优缺点进行公正的讨论。