Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;52(4):373-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.74316.
The assessment of insight is a part of the routine clinical examination for people with mental illness. Such assessment, by psychiatrists, is based on the current definitions of insight, which rely on western notions of health and illness. This paper discusses the recent findings of illness perspectives of people with a variety of physical diseases and mental disorders from India. Studies on insight in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders also examined explanatory models of illness among patients, relatives, and the general population. The findings argue for the fact that the assessment of insight should be against the local cultural standards rather than universal yardsticks. The assessment of insight should evaluate awareness, attribution, and action. People with psychosis who are able to re-label their psychotic experience, offer non-delusional explanations for changes in themselves, which correspond to beliefs about illness held by the subculture, admit to the need for restitution, and seek locally available help, can be said to possess insight. The results recommend the use of universal conventions to assess insight in people with psychosis rather than the use of uniform criteria.
对洞察力的评估是对精神疾病患者进行常规临床检查的一部分。这种评估由精神科医生根据当前的洞察力定义进行,这些定义依赖于西方对健康和疾病的观念。本文讨论了来自印度的各种身体疾病和精神障碍患者的疾病观点的最新发现。对精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的洞察力研究还研究了患者、亲属和一般人群的疾病解释模型。研究结果表明,洞察力的评估应该针对当地的文化标准,而不是普遍的标准。洞察力的评估应该评估意识、归因和行动。能够重新标记自己的精神病体验、为自己的变化提供非妄想解释、与亚文化中关于疾病的信念相对应、承认需要恢复原状并寻求当地可获得的帮助的精神病患者,可以被认为具有洞察力。研究结果建议在评估精神病患者的洞察力时使用通用公约,而不是使用统一的标准。