• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的药物获益-风险分析决策中的随机多准则模型。

A stochastic multicriteria model for evidence-based decision making in drug benefit-risk analysis.

机构信息

Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2011 May 30;30(12):1419-28. doi: 10.1002/sim.4194. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4194
PMID:21268053
Abstract

Drug benefit-risk (BR) analysis is based on firm clinical evidence regarding various safety and efficacy outcomes. In this paper, we propose a new and more formal approach for constructing a supporting multi-criteria model that fully takes into account the evidence on efficacy and adverse drug reactions. Our approach is based on the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis methodology, which allows us to compute the typical value judgments that support a decision, to quantify decision uncertainty, and to compute a comprehensive BR profile. We construct a multi-criteria model for the therapeutic group of second-generation antidepressants. We assess fluoxetine and venlafaxine together with placebo according to incidence of treatment response and three common adverse drug reactions by using data from a published study. Our model shows that there are clear trade-offs among the treatment alternatives.

摘要

药物的获益-风险(BR)分析是基于有关各种安全性和疗效结果的可靠临床证据。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的、更为正式的方法来构建一个支持性的多标准模型,该模型充分考虑了疗效和药物不良反应的证据。我们的方法基于随机多标准可接受性分析方法,该方法允许我们计算支持决策的典型价值判断,量化决策不确定性,并计算综合的 BR 概况。我们为第二代抗抑郁药治疗组构建了一个多标准模型。我们根据一项已发表研究的数据,使用治疗反应发生率和三种常见药物不良反应,对氟西汀和文拉法辛与安慰剂进行了评估。我们的模型表明,治疗选择之间存在明显的权衡。

相似文献

1
A stochastic multicriteria model for evidence-based decision making in drug benefit-risk analysis.基于证据的药物获益-风险分析决策中的随机多准则模型。
Stat Med. 2011 May 30;30(12):1419-28. doi: 10.1002/sim.4194. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
2
Multicriteria benefit-risk assessment using network meta-analysis.多准则效益风险评估的网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;65(4):394-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
3
A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines - part 1: the development of a new model using multi-criteria decision analysis.药品效益-风险评估的定量方法——第1部分:使用多标准决策分析开发新模型
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16 Suppl 1:S2-S15. doi: 10.1002/pds.1435.
4
A multiattribute model for evaluating the benefit-risk profiles of treatment alternatives.一种用于评估治疗方案获益-风险概况的多属性模型。
Med Decis Making. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):104-15. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08323299. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
5
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
7
Two approaches to incorporate clinical data uncertainty into multiple criteria decision analysis for benefit-risk assessment of medicinal products.两种方法将临床数据不确定性纳入药物获益-风险评估的多准则决策分析中。
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):619-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
8
Statistical aspects in comparative benefit-risk assessment: challenges and opportunities for pharmaceutical statisticians.比较获益-风险评估中的统计学问题:制药统计学家面临的挑战与机遇
Pharm Stat. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):82-5. doi: 10.1002/pst.497. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Antidepressants: controversies about their efficacy in depression, their effect on suicidality and their place in a complex psychiatric treatment approach.抗抑郁药:关于其在抑郁症中的疗效、对自杀倾向的影响及其在复杂精神治疗方法中的地位的争议。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(3):180-95. doi: 10.1080/15622970903101665.
10
A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines - part 2: the practical application of a new model.药物效益-风险评估的定量方法——第2部分:一种新模型的实际应用
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16 Suppl 1:S16-41. doi: 10.1002/pds.1434.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical applications of methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision models: a scoping review.将患者偏好纳入医学决策模型的方法的实际应用:一项范围综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02945-5.
2
Methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision algorithms and models, and their quantification, balancing, and evaluation: a scoping review protocol.将患者偏好纳入医学决策算法和模型的方法及其量化、权衡和评估:一项范围综述方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Dec 1;22(12):2593-2600. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00498.
3
Appropriate design and reporting of superiority, equivalence and non-inferiority clinical trials incorporating a benefit-risk assessment: the BRAINS study including expert workshop.
纳入获益-风险评估的优效性、等效性和非劣效性临床试验的恰当设计和报告:包含专家研讨会的 BRAINS 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Oct;27(20):1-58. doi: 10.3310/BHQZ7691.
4
Estimating and visualising the trade-off between benefits and harms on multiple clinical outcomes in network meta-analysis.在网状荟萃分析中估计和可视化多个临床结局的获益与危害之间的权衡。
Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 11;12(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02376-1.
5
A simulated maximum likelihood procedure for analyzing imprecise trade-off thresholds between the benefits and harms of medicines.一种模拟最大似然程序,用于分析药物的获益和危害之间不精确的权衡阈值。
Stat Med. 2022 Dec 20;41(29):5612-5621. doi: 10.1002/sim.9583. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
6
Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.采用临床试验系统评价和多准则决策分析评估益生菌治疗 IBS 的疗效。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 28;14(13):2689. doi: 10.3390/nu14132689.
7
Multimethod quantitative benefit-risk assessment of treatments for moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.中重度骨关节炎治疗的多方法定量获益-风险评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;88(8):3837-3846. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15309. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Evaluating the Benefits of New Drugs in Health Technology Assessment Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study on Metastatic Prostate Cancer With the Dental and Pharmaceuticals Benefits Agency (TLV) in Sweden.使用多标准决策分析评估卫生技术评估中新药的益处:以瑞典牙科和药品福利局(TLV)对转移性前列腺癌的案例研究为例。
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Sep 15;3(2):2381468318796218. doi: 10.1177/2381468318796218. eCollection 2018 Jul-Dec.
9
Answering complex hierarchy questions in network meta-analysis.回答网络荟萃分析中的复杂层级问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01488-3.
10
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Benefit-Risk Analysis by National Regulatory Authorities.国家监管机构用于效益-风险分析的多标准决策分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 12;8:820335. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.820335. eCollection 2021.