• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision algorithms and models, and their quantification, balancing, and evaluation: a scoping review protocol.将患者偏好纳入医学决策算法和模型的方法及其量化、权衡和评估:一项范围综述方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Dec 1;22(12):2593-2600. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00498.
2
Practical applications of methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision models: a scoping review.将患者偏好纳入医学决策模型的方法的实际应用:一项范围综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02945-5.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Sustainability of Interprofessional Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.跨专业教育的可持续性:一项范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 9;13:e60763. doi: 10.2196/60763.
6
Use of machine learning in occupational risk communication for healthcare workers: protocol for scoping review.机器学习在医护人员职业风险沟通中的应用:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e088729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088729.
7
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
8
Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision making in poor prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review protocol.父母在预后不良的儿童癌症治疗决策中的价值观和偏好:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e046284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046284.
9
Patient engagement, treatment preferences and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder in adults: a scoping review protocol.成人阿片类物质使用障碍治疗中的患者参与、治疗偏好与共同决策:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e022267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022267.
10
Patient decision aids for hip and knee arthroplasty decision-making: a scoping review protocol.用于髋关节和膝关节置换术决策的患者决策辅助工具:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):e089305. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089305.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical applications of methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision models: a scoping review.将患者偏好纳入医学决策模型的方法的实际应用:一项范围综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02945-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.将患者价值观和偏好纳入医疗保健中:定性证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e067268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Opportunities and limitations of shared decision making in multidisciplinary tumor conferences with patient participation - A qualitative interview study with providers.有患者参与的多学科肿瘤会议中共享决策的机会和局限性 - 提供者的定性访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):792-799. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.临床决策支持系统概述:益处、风险及成功策略。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. eCollection 2020.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Amplifying Each Patient's Voice: A Systematic Review of Multi-criteria Decision Analyses Involving Patients.放大每位患者的声音:对涉及患者的多标准决策分析的系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):155-162. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0299-1.
7
Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities.医生与隐性偏见:医生如何在不经意间使医疗保健差异永久化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1504-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
8
Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decision making.将患者的偏好纳入医疗决策中。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):80S-93S. doi: 10.1177/1077558712461283. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
9
The values and value of patient-centered care.以患者为中心的护理的价值观与价值
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):100-3. doi: 10.1370/afm.1239.
10
A stochastic multicriteria model for evidence-based decision making in drug benefit-risk analysis.基于证据的药物获益-风险分析决策中的随机多准则模型。
Stat Med. 2011 May 30;30(12):1419-28. doi: 10.1002/sim.4194. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

将患者偏好纳入医学决策算法和模型的方法及其量化、权衡和评估:一项范围综述方案

Methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision algorithms and models, and their quantification, balancing, and evaluation: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Fusiak Jakub, Mansmann Ulrich, Hoffmann Verena S

机构信息

Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology - IBE, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Dec 1;22(12):2593-2600. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00498.

DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00498
PMID:39194046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11630654/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review is to identify and map methods used to incorporate patient preferences into medical algorithms and models as well as to report on their quantification, balancing, and evaluation in the literature. The review will focus on computational methods for incorporating patient preferences into algorithms and models at an individual level as well as the types of medical algorithms and models in which these methods have been applied.

INTRODUCTION

Medical algorithms and models are increasingly being used to support clinical and shared decision-making; however, their effectiveness, accuracy, acceptance, and comprehension may be limited if patients' preferences are not considered. To address this issue, it is important to explore methods integrating patient preferences.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will investigate patient preferences and their integration into medical algorithms and models for individual-level clinical decision-making. The scoping review will include diverse sources, such as peer-reviewed articles, clinical practice guidelines, gray literature, government reports, guidelines, and expert opinions for a comprehensive investigation of the subject.

METHODS

This scoping review will follow JBI methodology. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, the Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, the National Technical Reports Library, and the first 20 pages of Google Scholar. The search strategy will include keywords related to patient preferences, medical algorithms and models, decision-making, and software tools and frameworks. Data extraction and analysis will be guided by the JBI framework, which includes an explorative and qualitative analysis.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/qg3b5.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是识别和梳理将患者偏好纳入医学算法和模型的方法,以及报告这些方法在文献中的量化、权衡和评估情况。该综述将聚焦于在个体层面将患者偏好纳入算法和模型的计算方法,以及应用这些方法的医学算法和模型类型。

引言

医学算法和模型越来越多地用于支持临床决策和共同决策;然而,如果不考虑患者偏好,它们的有效性、准确性、可接受性和可理解性可能会受到限制。为解决这一问题,探索整合患者偏好的方法很重要。

纳入标准

本综述将研究患者偏好及其在个体层面临床决策的医学算法和模型中的整合情况。范围综述将包括多种来源,如同行评审文章、临床实践指南、灰色文献、政府报告、指南和专家意见,以便对该主题进行全面调查。

方法

本范围综述将遵循JBI方法。将在PubMed、科学网、ACM数字图书馆、IEEE Xplore、考科蓝图书馆、OpenGrey、国家技术报告图书馆以及谷歌学术的前20页进行全面搜索。搜索策略将包括与患者偏好、医学算法和模型、决策以及软件工具和框架相关的关键词。数据提取和分析将以JBI框架为指导,该框架包括探索性和定性分析。

综述注册

开放科学框架https://osf.io/qg3b5 。