Suppr超能文献

接受尿动力学检查的女性知情程度如何?

How well informed are women who undergo urodynamic testing?

机构信息

The Pelvic Floor Clinic, Women's Health Center, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Apr;30(4):572-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.21014. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

Abstract

AIMS

Urodynamic studies (UDS) are complex, invasive and may be emotionally and physically distressing. Inadequate information may heighten distress. Prior to UDS, our patients receive written and verbal information, yet concerns remains that some women may not be adequately informed. This study examined how informed women believe they are to undergo UDS in our clinic.

METHODS

This was a before-after questionnaire-based study. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 200 women prior to UD testing, and within 3 days of completion. Participants rated their level of agreement/disagreement with the following statements: I understand why I am having the test; I have been given enough information about the test; I understand what the test will involve. Women also reported their perceived levels of distress (anxiety, embarrassment, and discomfort).

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one women returned both pre- and post-UD questionnaires. Most (88.9%) had read the information sheet and agreed that they understood the indications for the testing (78.1%). Fewer agreed that they understood what the tests would involve (68.2%), or that they had been given enough information about the test (64.9%). The overall distress score (anxiety, embarrassment, and discomfort) was 6 (IQR 5-7; possible range 3-9).

CONCLUSIONS

Urodynamic testing remains an invasive yet prevalent form of urogynecological assessment. One-third of our patients may not understand what UD testing involves and may not feel adequately informed about the tests. Additional research to explore informational needs is important.

摘要

目的

尿动力学研究(UDS)复杂、有创,可能会给患者带来身体和情绪上的不适。如果信息提供不足,可能会加重患者的不适。在进行 UDS 之前,我们的患者会收到书面和口头的信息,但仍有一些患者可能无法得到充分的信息。本研究旨在调查在我们的诊所中,女性患者在接受 UDS 前认为自己对检查的了解程度。

方法

这是一项前后问卷调查研究。从我们诊所的 200 名女性中随机抽取了便利样本,在进行 UDS 测试前和测试后 3 天内收集数据。参与者对以下陈述的同意/不同意程度进行评分:我理解为什么要进行这项检查;我已经获得了足够的关于这项检查的信息;我理解这项检查将涉及什么。女性还报告了她们感知到的不适程度(焦虑、尴尬和不适)。

结果

151 名女性返回了 UDS 测试前后的问卷。大多数女性(88.9%)阅读了信息表,并同意他们理解检查的适应证(78.1%)。但只有较少的女性同意她们理解检查将涉及什么(68.2%),或者她们已经获得了足够的关于检查的信息(64.9%)。总体不适评分(焦虑、尴尬和不适)为 6(IQR 5-7;可能范围 3-9)。

结论

UDS 仍然是一种有创但常见的尿失禁评估方法。我们的三分之一患者可能不理解 UDS 检查的具体内容,也可能对检查的了解不够充分。进一步研究探索信息需求很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验