Suppr超能文献

[度他雄胺与坦索罗辛联合治疗西班牙良性前列腺增生症的成本效益分析]

[Cost-effectiveness of the combination therapy of dutasteride and tamsulosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperlasia in Spain].

作者信息

Antoñanzas F, Brenes F, Molero J M, Fernández-Pro A, Huerta A, Palencia R, Cozar J M

机构信息

Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de la Rioja, Logroño, España.

出版信息

Actas Urol Esp. 2011 Feb;35(2):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2010.11.008. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin (DUT+TAM) as initiation treatment versus the most used drug in Spain, tamsulosin (TAM), in the treatment of moderate to severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with risk of progression.

METHODS

a semi-Markov model was developed using 4-year and 35-year time horizons and from the Spanish National Healthcare Service perspective. Data were obtained from the CombAT trial. Effectiveness was measured in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Health care resources were defined by an experts' panel, and unitary costs were obtained from published Spanish sources. Pharmacologic cost is expressed in PTP(WAT); in the case of TAM, the generic price is used, in the case of DUT+TAM the price of a fixed dose combination is used. Costs are expressed in 2010 Euros.

RESULTS

combination therapy with DUT+TAM produces an incremental effectiveness of 0.06QALY at year 4 and 0.4QALY at year 35. DUT+TAM represents an incremental cost of € 810.53 at 4 years and € 3,443.62 at 35 years. Therefore, the ICER for DUT+TAM versus TAM is € 14,023.32/QALY at year 4 and € 8,750.15/QALY at year 35.

CONCLUSIONS

initiation treatment with DUT+TAM represents a cost-effective treatment versus TAM, the most used treatment in Spain, due to the fact the ICER is below the threshold that usually allows a technology to be considered as cost-effective.

摘要

目的

评估度他雄胺与坦索罗辛联合治疗(DUT+TAM)作为初始治疗方案相对于西班牙最常用药物坦索罗辛(TAM),用于治疗有进展风险的中重度良性前列腺增生(BPH)的增量成本-效果比(ICER)。

方法

采用半马尔可夫模型,时间跨度为4年和35年,从西班牙国家医疗服务体系的角度进行分析。数据来源于CombAT试验。有效性通过质量调整生命年(QALYs)来衡量。医疗资源由一个专家小组确定,单位成本从已发表的西班牙资料中获取。药物成本以每治疗周期价格(PTP[WAT])表示;对于TAM,使用通用价格,对于DUT+TAM,使用固定剂量组合的价格。成本以2010年欧元表示。

结果

DUT+TAM联合治疗在第4年产生的增量效果为0.06QALY,在第35年为0.4QALY。DUT+TAM在4年时的增量成本为810.53欧元,在35年时为3443.62欧元。因此,DUT+TAM相对于TAM的ICER在第4年为14023.32欧元/QALY,在第35年为8750.15欧元/QALY。

结论

与西班牙最常用的治疗方法TAM相比,DUT+TAM作为初始治疗方案具有成本效益,因为ICER低于通常使一项技术被视为具有成本效益的阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验