• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[度他雄胺与坦索罗辛联合治疗西班牙良性前列腺增生症的成本效益分析]

[Cost-effectiveness of the combination therapy of dutasteride and tamsulosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperlasia in Spain].

作者信息

Antoñanzas F, Brenes F, Molero J M, Fernández-Pro A, Huerta A, Palencia R, Cozar J M

机构信息

Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de la Rioja, Logroño, España.

出版信息

Actas Urol Esp. 2011 Feb;35(2):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2010.11.008. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2010.11.008
PMID:21269736
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin (DUT+TAM) as initiation treatment versus the most used drug in Spain, tamsulosin (TAM), in the treatment of moderate to severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with risk of progression.

METHODS

a semi-Markov model was developed using 4-year and 35-year time horizons and from the Spanish National Healthcare Service perspective. Data were obtained from the CombAT trial. Effectiveness was measured in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Health care resources were defined by an experts' panel, and unitary costs were obtained from published Spanish sources. Pharmacologic cost is expressed in PTP(WAT); in the case of TAM, the generic price is used, in the case of DUT+TAM the price of a fixed dose combination is used. Costs are expressed in 2010 Euros.

RESULTS

combination therapy with DUT+TAM produces an incremental effectiveness of 0.06QALY at year 4 and 0.4QALY at year 35. DUT+TAM represents an incremental cost of € 810.53 at 4 years and € 3,443.62 at 35 years. Therefore, the ICER for DUT+TAM versus TAM is € 14,023.32/QALY at year 4 and € 8,750.15/QALY at year 35.

CONCLUSIONS

initiation treatment with DUT+TAM represents a cost-effective treatment versus TAM, the most used treatment in Spain, due to the fact the ICER is below the threshold that usually allows a technology to be considered as cost-effective.

摘要

目的

评估度他雄胺与坦索罗辛联合治疗(DUT+TAM)作为初始治疗方案相对于西班牙最常用药物坦索罗辛(TAM),用于治疗有进展风险的中重度良性前列腺增生(BPH)的增量成本-效果比(ICER)。

方法

采用半马尔可夫模型,时间跨度为4年和35年,从西班牙国家医疗服务体系的角度进行分析。数据来源于CombAT试验。有效性通过质量调整生命年(QALYs)来衡量。医疗资源由一个专家小组确定,单位成本从已发表的西班牙资料中获取。药物成本以每治疗周期价格(PTP[WAT])表示;对于TAM,使用通用价格,对于DUT+TAM,使用固定剂量组合的价格。成本以2010年欧元表示。

结果

DUT+TAM联合治疗在第4年产生的增量效果为0.06QALY,在第35年为0.4QALY。DUT+TAM在4年时的增量成本为810.53欧元,在35年时为3443.62欧元。因此,DUT+TAM相对于TAM的ICER在第4年为14023.32欧元/QALY,在第35年为8750.15欧元/QALY。

结论

与西班牙最常用的治疗方法TAM相比,DUT+TAM作为初始治疗方案具有成本效益,因为ICER低于通常使一项技术被视为具有成本效益的阈值。

相似文献

1
[Cost-effectiveness of the combination therapy of dutasteride and tamsulosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperlasia in Spain].[度他雄胺与坦索罗辛联合治疗西班牙良性前列腺增生症的成本效益分析]
Actas Urol Esp. 2011 Feb;35(2):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2010.11.008. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
2
[Comment to: «Cost-Effectiveness of the combination therapy of dutasteride and tamsulosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperlasia in Spain»].[对《度他雄胺与坦索罗辛联合治疗西班牙良性前列腺增生症的成本效益》的评论]
Actas Urol Esp. 2011 Feb;35(2):72. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
3
Cost-effectiveness of single-dose tamsulosin and dutasteride combination therapy compared with tamsulosin monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in the UK.英国良性前列腺增生患者中单剂量坦索罗辛和度他雄胺联合治疗与坦索罗辛单药治疗的成本效益比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):638-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11659.x. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
4
Dutasteride plus tamsulosin fixed-dose combination first-line therapy versus tamsulosin monotherapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a budget impact analysis in the Greek healthcare setting.度他雄胺与坦索罗辛固定剂量联合用药一线治疗与坦索罗辛单药治疗良性前列腺增生的对比:希腊医疗环境下的预算影响分析
BMC Urol. 2014 Sep 26;14:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-78.
5
Cost-effectiveness of combination therapy for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a model based on the findings of the Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin trial.治疗良性前列腺增生症的联合治疗的成本效益:基于阿夫唑嗪和坦索罗辛联合治疗试验结果的模型。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(5):731-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10511.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
6
[Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of combination therapy with dutasteride and α1 blocker for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Japan].[度他雄胺与α1受体阻滞剂联合治疗日本良性前列腺增生症的药物经济学评价]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2012 Feb;58(2):61-9.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Colombian Experience.联合治疗与单一疗法治疗良性前列腺增生的成本效益:哥伦比亚的经验
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 Dec;17:174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model.从尼日利亚中等收入水平视角出发,采用交互式马尔可夫模型,对度他雄胺与坦索罗辛固定剂量复方制剂和度他雄胺单药治疗良性前列腺增生进行成本效益分析
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16:405. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2431-x.
9
Effect of dutasteride, tamsulosin and the combination on patient-reported quality of life and treatment satisfaction in men with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia: 4-year data from the CombAT study.度他雄胺、坦索罗辛和联合治疗对中重度良性前列腺增生患者报告的生活质量和治疗满意度的影响:来自 CombAT 研究的 4 年数据。
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Jul;64(8):1042-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02428.x. Epub 2010 May 7.
10
Cost effectiveness comparison of dutasteride and finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia--The Markov model based on data from Montenegro.度他雄胺和非那雄胺治疗良性前列腺增生症患者的成本效益比较——基于黑山数据的马尔可夫模型
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016 Jan;73(1):26-33. doi: 10.2298/vsp141024129d.

引用本文的文献

1
Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain.利拉鲁肽与利司那肽对比:西班牙2型糖尿病治疗中GLP-1受体激动剂疗法的长期成本效益
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Apr;8(2):401-415. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0239-6. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
Fixed-dose combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.度他雄胺与坦索罗辛固定剂量联合疗法用于良性前列腺增生的治疗
Ther Adv Urol. 2016 Feb;8(1):19-28. doi: 10.1177/1756287215607419.
3
Cost-effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination of solifenacin and oral controlled adsorption system formulation of tamsulosin in men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
索利那新与坦索罗辛口服控释吸附系统制剂固定剂量组合用于治疗伴有良性前列腺增生的下尿路症状男性患者的成本效益分析
BMC Urol. 2015 May 9;15:41. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0031-8.
4
Dutasteride plus tamsulosin fixed-dose combination first-line therapy versus tamsulosin monotherapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a budget impact analysis in the Greek healthcare setting.度他雄胺与坦索罗辛固定剂量联合用药一线治疗与坦索罗辛单药治疗良性前列腺增生的对比:希腊医疗环境下的预算影响分析
BMC Urol. 2014 Sep 26;14:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-78.
5
Dutasteride/tamsulosin: in benign prostatic hyperplasia.度他雄胺/坦索罗辛:用于治疗良性前列腺增生。
Drugs Aging. 2012 May 1;29(5):405-19. doi: 10.2165/11208920-000000000-00000.