Dept. of Physical Therapy, Univ. of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9174, USA.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011 Apr;300(4):R969-77. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00768.2010. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
We examined the transfer function of autonomic heart rate (HR) control in anesthetized sedentary and exercise-trained (16 wk, treadmill for 1 h, 5 times/wk at 15 m/min and 15-degree grade) rats for comparison to HR variability assessed in the conscious resting state. The transfer function from sympathetic stimulation to HR response was similar between groups (gain, 4.2 ± 1.5 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5 beats·min(-1)·Hz(-1); natural frequency, 0.07 ± 0.01 vs. 0.08 ± 0.01 Hz; damping coefficient, 1.96 ± 0.55 vs. 1.69 ± 0.15; and lag time, 0.7 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 s; sedentary vs. exercise trained, respectively, means ± SD). The transfer gain from vagal stimulation to HR response was 6.1 ± 3.0 in the sedentary and 9.7 ± 5.1 beats·min(-1)·Hz(-1) in the exercise-trained group (P = 0.06). The corner frequency (0.11 ± 0.05 vs. 0.17 ± 0.09 Hz) and lag time (0.1 ± 0.1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 s) did not differ between groups. When the sympathetic transfer gain was averaged for very-low-frequency and low-frequency bands, no significant group effect was observed. In contrast, when the vagal transfer gain was averaged for very-low-frequency, low-frequency, and high-frequency bands, exercise training produced a significant group effect (P < 0.05 by two-way, repeated-measures ANOVA). These findings suggest that, in the frequency domain, exercise training augments the dynamic HR response to vagal stimulation but not sympathetic stimulation, regardless of the frequency bands.
我们检查了麻醉静止和运动训练(16 周,跑步机 1 小时,每周 5 次,速度为 15m/min,坡度为 15 度)大鼠自主心率(HR)控制的传递函数,以便与在清醒静息状态下评估的 HR 变异性进行比较。两组之间交感神经刺激到 HR 反应的传递函数相似(增益,4.2±1.5 与 4.5±1.5 次/分钟·赫兹(-1);自然频率,0.07±0.01 与 0.08±0.01 赫兹;阻尼系数,1.96±0.55 与 1.69±0.15;滞后时间,0.7±0.1 与 0.6±0.1 秒;分别为静止和运动训练,平均值±SD)。在静止组中,从迷走神经刺激到 HR 反应的传递增益为 6.1±3.0,在运动训练组中为 9.7±5.1 次/分钟·赫兹(-1)(P=0.06)。转角频率(0.11±0.05 与 0.17±0.09 赫兹)和滞后时间(0.1±0.1 与 0.2±0.1 秒)在两组之间没有差异。当非常低频率和低频率带的交感神经传递增益被平均时,没有观察到显著的组间效应。相比之下,当非常低频率、低频率和高频率带的迷走神经传递增益被平均时,运动训练产生了显著的组间效应(通过双向、重复测量方差分析,P<0.05)。这些发现表明,在频域中,运动训练增强了对迷走神经刺激的动态 HR 反应,而对交感神经刺激没有影响,无论频率带如何。