• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

γ-射线或铁离子照射后,增殖和非增殖人乳腺上皮细胞中 γ-H2AX 和 53BP1 焦点的持续存在。

Persistence of γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci in proliferating and non-proliferating human mammary epithelial cells after exposure to γ-rays or iron ions.

机构信息

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Life Sciences Division, Department of Cancer and DNA Damage Responses, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Jul;87(7):696-710. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2010.549535. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

DOI:10.3109/09553002.2010.549535
PMID:21271785
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate γ-H2AX (phosphorylated histone H2AX) and 53BP1 (tumour protein 53 binding protein No. 1) foci formation and removal in proliferating and non-proliferating human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) after exposure to sparsely and densely ionising radiation under different cell culture conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

HMEC cells were grown either as monolayers (2D) or in extracellular matrix to allow the formation of acinar structures in vitro (3D). Foci numbers were quantified by image analysis at various time points after exposure.

RESULTS

Our results reveal that in non-proliferating cells under 2D and 3D cell culture conditions, iron-ion induced γ-H2AX foci were still present at 72 h after exposure, although 53BP1 foci returned to control levels at 48 h. In contrast in proliferating HMEC, both γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci decreased to control levels during the 24-48 h time interval after irradiation under 2D conditions. Foci numbers decreased faster after γ-ray irradiation and returned to control levels by 12 h regardless of marker, cell proliferation status, and cell culture condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The disappearance of radiation-induced γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci in HMEC has different dynamics that depend on radiation quality and proliferation status. Notably, the general patterns do not depend on the cell culture condition (2D versus 3D). We speculate that the persistent γ-H2AX foci in iron-ion irradiated non-proliferating cells could be due to limited availability of double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways in G0/G1-phase, or that repair of complex DSB requires replication or chromatin remodelling.

摘要

目的

研究在不同细胞培养条件下,低剂量和高剂量电离辐射暴露后,增殖和非增殖人乳腺上皮细胞(HMEC)中 γ-H2AX(磷酸化组蛋白 H2AX)和 53BP1(肿瘤蛋白 53 结合蛋白 1 号)焦点的形成和消除。

材料与方法

HMEC 细胞在单层(2D)或细胞外基质中培养,以允许体外形成腺泡结构(3D)。在暴露后不同时间点通过图像分析定量焦点数量。

结果

我们的结果表明,在 2D 和 3D 细胞培养条件下的非增殖细胞中,尽管在 48 小时时 53BP1 焦点恢复到对照水平,但铁离子诱导的 γ-H2AX 焦点在暴露后 72 小时仍然存在。相比之下,在增殖的 HMEC 中,在 2D 条件下照射后 24-48 小时的时间间隔内,γ-H2AX 和 53BP1 焦点均降低至对照水平。无论标记物、细胞增殖状态和细胞培养条件如何,γ 射线照射后焦点数量下降更快,并在 12 小时内恢复至对照水平。

结论

HMEC 中辐射诱导的 γ-H2AX 和 53BP1 焦点的消失具有不同的动力学,这取决于辐射质量和增殖状态。值得注意的是,一般模式不依赖于细胞培养条件(2D 与 3D)。我们推测,铁离子照射的非增殖细胞中持续存在的 γ-H2AX 焦点可能是由于 G0/G1 期双链断裂(DSB)修复途径的有限可用性,或者修复复杂的 DSB 需要复制或染色质重塑。

相似文献

1
Persistence of γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci in proliferating and non-proliferating human mammary epithelial cells after exposure to γ-rays or iron ions.γ-射线或铁离子照射后,增殖和非增殖人乳腺上皮细胞中 γ-H2AX 和 53BP1 焦点的持续存在。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Jul;87(7):696-710. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2010.549535. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
2
Kinetics and dose-response of residual 53BP1/gamma-H2AX foci: co-localization, relationship with DSB repair and clonogenic survival.残留53BP1/γ-H2AX病灶的动力学和剂量反应:共定位、与DNA双链断裂修复的关系及克隆形成存活率
Int J Radiat Biol. 2007 May;83(5):319-29. doi: 10.1080/09553000601170469.
3
Long time persistence of residual 53BP1/γ-H2AX foci in human lymphocytes in relationship to apoptosis, chromatin condensation and biological dosimetry.人淋巴细胞中残余 53BP1/γ-H2AX 焦点的长时间持续与细胞凋亡、染色质凝聚和生物剂量学的关系。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Jul;87(7):736-45. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2011.577504.
4
In vivo formation of gamma-H2AX and 53BP1 DNA repair foci in blood cells after radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer.分化型甲状腺癌碘 131 治疗后血细胞中 γ-H2AX 和 53BP1 两种 DNA 修复焦点的体内形成。
J Nucl Med. 2010 Aug;51(8):1318-25. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.071357. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
5
Analysis of Lymphocytic DNA Damage in Early Multiple Sclerosis by Automated Gamma-H2AX and 53BP1 Foci Detection: A Case Control Study.通过自动γ-H2AX和53BP1病灶检测分析早期多发性硬化症患者淋巴细胞DNA损伤:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147968. eCollection 2016.
6
γ-H2AX/53BP1/pKAP-1 foci and their linear tracks induced by in vitro exposure to radon and its progeny in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.体外暴露于氡及其子体后在人外周血淋巴细胞中诱导的γ-H2AX/53BP1/pKAP-1 焦点和线性轨迹。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 6;6:38295. doi: 10.1038/srep38295.
7
Comparison of several radiation effects in human MCF10A mammary epithelial cells cultured as 2D monolayers or 3D acinar stuctures in matrigel.在基质胶中作为二维单层或三维腺泡结构培养的人MCF10A乳腺上皮细胞中几种辐射效应的比较。
Radiat Res. 2009 Jun;171(6):708-15. doi: 10.1667/RR1554.1.
8
The profiles of gamma-H2AX along with ATM/DNA-PKcs activation in the lymphocytes and granulocytes of rat and human blood exposed to gamma rays.γ射线照射后大鼠和人血液中淋巴细胞及粒细胞内γ-H2AX的分布情况以及ATM/DNA-PKcs的激活情况。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2016 Aug;55(3):359-70. doi: 10.1007/s00411-016-0653-6. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
9
Predicting Radiosensitivity with Gamma-H2AX Foci Assay after Single High-Dose-Rate and Pulsed Dose-Rate Ionizing Irradiation.单次高剂量率和脉冲剂量率电离辐射后用γ-H2AX焦点分析法预测放射敏感性
Radiat Res. 2016 Feb;185(2):190-8. doi: 10.1667/RR14098.1. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
10
Radiosensitivity in breast cancer assessed by the histone γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci.通过组蛋白 γ-H2AX 和 53BP1 焦点评估乳腺癌的放射敏感性。
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Apr 24;8:98. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-98.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterologous Expression of Either Human or Soya Bean Ferritins in Budding Yeast Reveals Common Functions Protecting Against Oxidative Agents and Counteracting Double-Strand Break Accumulation.人源或大豆铁蛋白在出芽酵母中的异源表达揭示了抵御氧化试剂和对抗双链断裂积累的共同功能。
Biomolecules. 2025 Mar 20;15(3):447. doi: 10.3390/biom15030447.
2
Synergistic Antitumor Activity of Talazoparib and Temozolomide in Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors.他拉唑帕尼与替莫唑胺联合用于恶性横纹肌样肿瘤的协同抗肿瘤活性
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 28;16(11):2041. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112041.
3
Modelling the In Vivo and Ex Vivo DNA Damage Response after Internal Irradiation of Blood from Patients with Thyroid Cancer.
甲状腺癌患者血液内照射后体内和体外 DNA 损伤反应的建模。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 17;25(10):5493. doi: 10.3390/ijms25105493.
4
Effects of acute low-moderate dose ionizing radiation to human brain organoids.急性低中剂量电离辐射对人类脑类器官的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 May 31;18(5):e0282958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282958. eCollection 2023.
5
Unraveling astrocyte behavior in the space brain: Radiation response of primary astrocytes.解析空间大脑中的星形胶质细胞行为:原代星形胶质细胞的辐射反应。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 6;11:1063250. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1063250. eCollection 2023.
6
Establishment of Calibration Curve for Co-γ-rays Induced Phospho-53BP1 Foci, Rapid Biodosimetry and Initial Triage, and Comparative Evaluations With γH2AX and Cytogenetic Assays.建立 Co-γ射线诱导的磷酸化 53BP1 焦点的校准曲线、快速生物剂量测定和初步分类,并与 γH2AX 和细胞遗传学检测进行比较评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;10:845200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.845200. eCollection 2022.
7
Spatiotemporal dynamics of γH2AX in the mouse brain after acute irradiation at different postnatal days with special reference to the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus.急性照射后不同日龄小鼠脑内 γH2AX 的时空动力学变化及其与海马齿状回的关系。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Jun 23;13(12):15815-15832. doi: 10.18632/aging.203202.
8
Exploring the advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy: experimental validation of biological effects using two different beam intensity-modulation patterns.探索强度调制质子治疗的优势:使用两种不同的强度调制模式对生物学效应进行实验验证。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):3199. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60246-5.
9
DNA DSB Repair Dynamics following Irradiation with Laser-Driven Protons at Ultra-High Dose Rates.激光驱动质子超高剂量率辐照后 DNA 双链断裂修复动力学。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 14;9(1):4471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40339-6.
10
xCT inhibition sensitizes tumors to γ-radiation via glutathione reduction.xCT抑制通过降低谷胱甘肽使肿瘤对γ辐射敏感。
Oncotarget. 2018 Aug 17;9(64):32280-32297. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25794.