Laboratory of Clinical and Translational Studies, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Jan;1216:50-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05898.x.
We compare the evidence from human neuroimaging studies for and against two of the major hypotheses of how alterations in the brain's reward system underlie addiction. One of these, the impulsivity hypothesis, proposes that addiction is characterized by excessive sensitivity to reward combined with a failure of inhibition. The other, the reward-deficiency hypothesis, proposes that addicted individuals have a reduced response to nondrug rewards that leads them to seek drugs in preference to more socially acceptable goals. Positron emission tomographic (PET) studies of dopamine receptor density and dopamine release strongly support the reward-deficiency hypothesis, while the more recent and numerous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of goal-directed behavior provide both support and contradiction for each of the hypotheses. Differences in the time scale on which PET and fMRI make measurements probably account for differences in results, at least in part. It is likely that aspects of brain function described by both the impulsivity and reward-deficiency hypotheses contribute to the pathophysiology of addiction.
我们比较了来自人类神经影像学研究的证据,以支持和反对两种关于大脑奖励系统改变如何导致成瘾的主要假说。其中之一是冲动性假说,该假说认为成瘾的特征是对奖励过度敏感,同时缺乏抑制。另一个是奖励缺失假说,该假说认为成瘾者对非药物奖励的反应降低,导致他们更倾向于吸毒,而不是更符合社会规范的目标。正电子发射断层扫描(PET)研究表明多巴胺受体密度和多巴胺释放强烈支持奖励缺失假说,而最近更多的关于目标导向行为的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究则为两个假说都提供了支持和矛盾的证据。PET 和 fMRI 在测量时间尺度上的差异可能导致了结果的差异,至少在一定程度上是这样。很可能是冲动性和奖励缺失假说所描述的大脑功能的各个方面都有助于成瘾的病理生理学。