Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA.
Acad Pediatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.10.004.
The aim of this study was to determine if a quality improvement intervention in a teaching clinic was associated with the following: 1) improved asthma action plan creation and distribution, 2)increased classification of asthma patients as intermittent or persistent, 3) increased prescriptions of asthma controller medications, 4) decreased emergency department visits and hospitalizations, and 5) sustainable changes in outcomes after the intervention year.
A retrospective analysis was conducted of a quality improvement project involving children aged >2 years who were diagnosed with asthma, evaluated in a large hospital-based teaching clinic. Outcomes were assessed for 1 year before and 3 years after quality improvement intervention.
Data from children with asthma seen in the clinic over the 4 years of the study (N = 1797) were analyzed. Mixed effects model regressions showed that children after the intervention were over twofold more likely to receive an asthma action plan (using 2006 as referent, adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-2.56 in 2007; ARR 2.40, 95% CI 2.15-2.66 in 2008; ARR 2.86, 95% CI 2.60-3.20 in 2009). Recorded assessment of asthma severity was 31% to 47% more likely post-intervention (ARR 1.31, 95% CI 1.26-1.36 in 2007, ARR 1.44 95% CI 1.38-1.50 in 2008, ARR 1.47 95% 1.41-1.54 in 2009). Controller medication prescribing increased postintervention ARR 1.08, 95% CI, 1.02-1.14 in 2007; ARR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.04-1.17 in 2008; ARR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.05-1.19 in 2009. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations trended lower postintervention (not significant).
A quality improvement intervention in a hospital-based teaching clinic was associated with increased use of asthma action plans, classification of asthma severity, and controller medications, and possibly a trend toward fewer emergency visits and hospitalizations.
本研究旨在确定在教学诊所实施质量改进干预措施是否与以下方面相关:1)改善哮喘行动计划的制定和分发;2)增加间歇性或持续性哮喘患者的分类;3)增加哮喘控制药物的处方;4)减少急诊就诊和住院;5)干预年后结果的可持续变化。
对一项涉及在大型医院教学诊所就诊的>2 岁儿童哮喘诊断的质量改进项目进行回顾性分析。在质量改进干预前和后 3 年评估结果。
对研究期间(n=1797)在诊所就诊的哮喘患儿的数据进行了分析。混合效应模型回归显示,干预后儿童接受哮喘行动计划的可能性增加了两倍多(以 2006 年为参照,2007 年调整后的风险比 [ARR] 2.29,95%置信区间 [CI] 2.03-2.56;2008 年 ARR 2.40,95%CI 2.15-2.66;2009 年 ARR 2.86,95%CI 2.60-3.20)。干预后,记录的哮喘严重程度评估增加了 31%至 47%(2007 年 ARR 1.31,95%CI 1.26-1.36;2008 年 ARR 1.44,95%CI 1.38-1.50;2009 年 ARR 1.47,95%CI 1.41-1.54)。干预后,控制器药物的开具增加,ARR 为 1.08,95%CI 为 1.02-1.14,2007 年;ARR 为 1.11,95%CI 为 1.04-1.17,2008 年;ARR 为 1.11,95%CI 为 1.05-1.19,2009 年。急诊就诊和住院人数呈下降趋势(无统计学意义)。
在医院教学诊所实施质量改进干预措施与哮喘行动计划的使用增加、哮喘严重程度的分类以及控制药物的使用增加有关,并且可能与急诊就诊和住院人数减少的趋势有关。