Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Phys Ther. 2011 Mar;91(3):381-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100232. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
Previous studies focused on describing successful sit-to-stand (STS) performance in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). Little is known about why these patients fail to perform this transfer activity. Objective This study aimed to determine the role of dynamic stability and limb support in governing successful STS performance in patients with PD and to determine the limits of recovery for discriminating between successful and failed STS trials.
This was a cross-sectional study.
Twenty-eight patients with PD were instructed to perform the STS task. Kinematic data on 18 successful trials and 14 failed trials (when the patients fell backward) were collected with a motion analysis system. Dynamic stability was determined by the anteroposterior position of the body's center of mass (COM) relative to the base of support (BOS) and by the anteroposterior velocity of the COM relative to the BOS (Velocity(COM/BOS,AP)). Limb support was characterized by the hip height (Height(hip)).
/b> The findings revealed no between-group ("risers" versus "fallers") differences in dynamic stability. The fallers shifted their COM in a significantly more anterior position to compensate for their lower Velocity(COM/BOS,AP) at seat-off. It was in the vertical direction that the fallers had significantly reduced peak COM velocity (Velocity(COM,vertical)) and lower corresponding Height(hip) than the risers. Results of a stepwise regression model showed that Velocity(COM/BOS,AP) and Height(hip) at the instant of peak Velocity(COM,vertical) could best predict the STS outcome (success versus failure), with an overall prediction accuracy of 87.5%. The limit differentiating successful from failed STS trials was: Height(hip)=-0.814 Velocity(COM/BOS,AP) + 0.463. Limitations All of the patients were community dwelling and had a moderate level of disease severity. The results cannot be generalized to those who are institutionalized or with advanced PD.
Limb support and ill-timed peak forward COM velocity, rather than dynamic stability, play the dominant roles in determining successful STS performance in patients with PD.
先前的研究侧重于描述帕金森病(PD)患者成功的坐站(STS)表现。对于为什么这些患者无法进行此转移活动知之甚少。目的 本研究旨在确定动态稳定性和肢体支撑在控制 PD 患者成功 STS 表现中的作用,并确定区分成功和失败 STS 试验的恢复极限。
这是一项横断面研究。
指导 28 名 PD 患者进行 STS 任务。使用运动分析系统收集 18 次成功试验和 14 次失败试验(当患者向后跌倒时)的运动学数据。通过身体质心(COM)相对于支撑基础(BOS)的前后位置和 COM 相对于 BOS 的前后速度(Velocity(COM/BOS,AP))来确定动态稳定性。肢体支撑的特征是髋关节高度(Height(hip))。
发现两组(“站立者”与“跌倒者”)之间在动态稳定性方面没有差异。跌倒者将 COM 移到更靠前的位置,以补偿其在座椅起飞时较低的 Velocity(COM/BOS,AP)。正是在垂直方向上,跌倒者的 COM 速度峰值(Velocity(COM,vertical))显著降低,相应的 Height(hip)也低于站立者。逐步回归模型的结果表明,Velocity(COM/BOS,AP)和 Height(hip)在 Velocity(COM,vertical)峰值时可以最好地预测 STS 结果(成功与失败),总体预测准确率为 87.5%。区分成功和失败 STS 试验的极限是:Height(hip)=-0.814 Velocity(COM/BOS,AP)+0.463。局限性 所有患者均为社区居住,且疾病严重程度处于中度水平。结果不能推广到那些住院或患有晚期 PD 的患者。
在 PD 患者中,肢体支撑和时机不佳的 COM 向前速度峰值而非动态稳定性在决定成功的 STS 表现中起主导作用。