Seubert Steven M, Wade Gordon A, Wiegmann Daniel D
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.
J Math Biol. 2011 Dec;63(6):1121-38. doi: 10.1007/s00285-010-0399-8. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
The strategy employed by a female to sample prospective mates determines the likelihood that a high-quality male is encountered in the search process. In general, the choosiness of females is expected to depend on the variability of quality amongst the males that are sampled. The sequential search strategy is a prominent model of search behavior that involves the use of a threshold criterion to evaluate encountered individuals. In this paper, we show that the stochastic dominance of one distribution of male quality over another at the second order is necessary and sufficient for the optimal threshold criterion to differ under two distributions of male quality when the cost to sample males is held constant and the mean quality of males under each of the distributions is identical. A difference of the variance of male quality between two distributions does not imply that one distribution stochastically dominates the other at the second order and, hence, should not, in general, be used to assess the relative variability of quality amongst prospective mates. The adjustment of the threshold criterion in response to experimental manipulations of the distribution of male quality has been inferred from induced differences of the duration of search or the number of males sampled in the search process. Here we show that such inferences are unjustified. In particular, the difference of the threshold criterion imposed by second-order stochastic dominance does not determine the distribution under which females are expected to sample a larger number of males in the search process.
雌性用于挑选潜在配偶的策略决定了在寻找过程中遇到高质量雄性的可能性。一般来说,雌性的挑剔程度预计取决于所挑选雄性中质量的变异性。顺序搜索策略是一种突出的搜索行为模型,它涉及使用阈值标准来评估遇到的个体。在本文中,我们表明,当对雄性进行采样的成本保持不变且每种分布下雄性的平均质量相同时,在二阶情况下一种雄性质量分布相对于另一种分布的随机优势是最优阈值标准在两种雄性质量分布下有所不同的充要条件。两种分布之间雄性质量方差的差异并不意味着一种分布在二阶情况下随机优于另一种分布,因此,一般来说,不应将其用于评估潜在配偶中质量的相对变异性。根据搜索持续时间或搜索过程中采样的雄性数量的诱导差异推断出对雄性质量分布的实验操纵所做出的阈值标准调整。在这里,我们表明这种推断是不合理的。特别是,由二阶随机优势施加的阈值标准差异并不能确定在何种分布下雌性在搜索过程中预计会采样更多的雄性。