Vanderbilt University, 37203, Nashvifle, Tennessee.
Mem Cognit. 1974 May;2(3):426-30. doi: 10.3758/BF03196899.
Ss were presented four-letter sequences either auditorily or visually and asked for ordered recall after 0, 2.1, 4.2, 8.4, or 12.6 sec of digit categorization. Three different rehearsal-prevention conditions were required during presentation of the memory set: categorizing, suppressing (saying "dah"), or pronouncing each letter. Recall was worst after categorizing, best after pronouncing. Auditory presentation led to better recall after no delay but more rapid forgetting than visual presentation, regardless of the rehearsal-prevention condition. These results, and analyses of auditory confusions, are inconsistent with a view of memory which asserts that sensory information is encoded auditorily regardless of presentation modality or vocalization behavior during presentation.
被试者通过听觉或视觉呈现四个字母的序列,并在数字分类后 0、2.1、4.2、8.4 或 12.6 秒进行有序回忆。在呈现记忆集时需要三种不同的抑制复述条件:分类、抑制(说“dah”)或发音每个字母。分类后回忆最差,发音后回忆最好。无论抑制复述条件如何,在没有延迟的情况下,听觉呈现导致更好的回忆,但比视觉呈现更快遗忘。这些结果,以及听觉混淆的分析,与一种记忆观点不一致,该观点认为,无论呈现方式如何,或者在呈现过程中是否发声,感觉信息都是以听觉形式编码的。