Doern G V, Tubert T A
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jul-Aug;13(4):349-52. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(90)90030-y.
The in vitro activity of BAY v 3522, a new orally absorbed cephalosporin, was assessed against 150 clinical isolates each of Haemophilus influenzae and Branhamella catarrhalis. The MIC90S for beta-lactamase-positive and -negative strains of H. influenzae were 8 and 2 micrograms/ml, respectively. For beta-lactamase-positive and -negative strains of B. catarrhalis, the BAY v 3522 MIC90S were 4 and 0.25 micrograms/ml, respectively. In general, BAY v 3522 was less active against H. influenzae than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefixime, equivalent in activity to cefuroxime, and more active than cefaclor. BAY v 3522 had activity most similar to cefuroxime and cefaclor for B. catarrhalis but was less active than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefixime.
新型口服吸收性头孢菌素BAY v 3522的体外活性针对150株流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌临床分离株进行了评估。流感嗜血杆菌β-内酰胺酶阳性和阴性菌株的MIC90分别为8和2微克/毫升。对于卡他莫拉菌β-内酰胺酶阳性和阴性菌株,BAY v 3522的MIC90分别为4和0.25微克/毫升。总体而言,BAY v 3522对流感嗜血杆菌的活性低于阿莫西林/克拉维酸和头孢克肟,活性与头孢呋辛相当,且比头孢克洛更具活性。BAY v 3522对卡他莫拉菌的活性与头孢呋辛和头孢克洛最为相似,但低于阿莫西林/克拉维酸和头孢克肟。