Suppr超能文献

老年澳大利亚退伍军人使用 COX-2 选择性或非选择性 NSAIDs 的全因死亡率:一项纵向研究。

All-cause mortality of elderly Australian veterans using COX-2 selective or non-selective NSAIDs: a longitudinal study.

机构信息

National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jun;71(6):936-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03702.x. Epub 2010 May 6.

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

• Previous studies have found varying impact of exposure to COX-2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

• Individuals receiving a COX-2 selective NSAID had an increased risk of all-cause mortality after correction for age, sex and cardiovascular risk as measured by co-prescription. • Despite differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of the COX-2 selective inhibitor drugs, our study lends no support to clinicians preferring any one COX-2 selective inhibitor drug, or substituting one for another on the grounds of mortality risk alone. • The Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs data sets make it possible to conduct timely record linkage studies of all-cause mortality from use of medicines in a large and clinically relevant population.

AIM

To determine hazard ratios for all-cause mortality in elderly Australian veterans taking COX-2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs.

METHODS

Patient cohorts were constructed from claims databases (1997 to 2007) for veterans and dependants with full treatment entitlement irrespective of military service. Patients were grouped by initial exposure: celecoxib, rofecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac, non-selective NSAID. A reference group was constructed of patients receiving glaucoma/hypothyroid medications and none of the study medications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for each exposure group against each of the reference group. The final model was adjusted for age, gender and co-prescription as a surrogate for cardiovascular risk. Patients were censored if the gap in supply of study prescription exceeded 30 days or if another study medication was initiated. The outcome measure in all analyses was death.

RESULTS

Hazard ratios and 95% CIs, adjusted for age, gender and cardiovascular risk, for each group relative to the reference group were: celecoxib 1.39 (1.25, 1.55), diclofenac 1.44 (1.28, 1.62), meloxicam 1.49 (1.25, 1.78), rofecoxib 1.58 (1.39, 1.79), non-selective NSAIDs 1.76 (1.59, 1.94).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of Australian veterans exposed to COX-2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs, there was a significant increased mortality risk for those exposed to either COX-2-selective or non-selective NSAIDs relative to those exposed to unrelated (glaucoma/hypothyroid) medications.

摘要

已知关于这一主题的信息

  • 之前的研究发现,接触 COX-2 选择性和非选择性 NSAIDs 的影响各不相同。

本研究的新发现

  • 在通过共开处方来衡量年龄、性别和心血管风险后,接受 COX-2 选择性 NSAID 的个体全因死亡率增加。

  • 尽管 COX-2 选择性抑制剂药物的药代动力学特性存在差异,但我们的研究结果不支持临床医生仅根据死亡率风险偏爱任何一种 COX-2 选择性抑制剂药物,或用一种药物替代另一种药物。

  • 澳大利亚退伍军人事务部的数据集使得有可能对大量具有临床相关性的人群使用药物的全因死亡率进行及时的记录链接研究。

目的

确定接受 COX-2 选择性和非选择性 NSAIDs 的澳大利亚老年退伍军人的全因死亡率的风险比。

方法

从退伍军人和有充分治疗资格的受抚养人(无论是否有兵役)的索赔数据库(1997 年至 2007 年)中构建患者队列。根据初始暴露情况对患者进行分组:塞来昔布、罗非昔布、美洛昔康、双氯芬酸、非选择性 NSAID。将接受青光眼/甲状腺功能减退药物治疗且未服用研究药物的患者作为参照组。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型进行单变量和多变量分析。对每个暴露组相对于每个参照组的全因死亡率进行风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)估计。最终模型调整了年龄、性别和共处方作为心血管风险的替代指标。如果研究处方的供应差距超过 30 天或开始使用另一种研究药物,则对患者进行删失。所有分析的结局指标都是死亡。

结果

根据年龄、性别和心血管风险调整后,与参照组相比,每个组的风险比(95%CI)分别为:塞来昔布 1.39(1.25,1.55)、双氯芬酸 1.44(1.28,1.62)、美洛昔康 1.49(1.25,1.78)、罗非昔布 1.58(1.39,1.79)、非选择性 NSAIDs 1.76(1.59,1.94)。

结论

在这项对澳大利亚退伍军人进行的 COX-2 选择性和非选择性 NSAIDs 暴露的大型队列研究中,与接触无关(青光眼/甲状腺功能减退)药物的患者相比,接触 COX-2 选择性或非选择性 NSAIDs 的患者死亡风险显著增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验