• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用作核材料的玻璃离子水门汀的尺寸稳定性。

Dimensional stability of glass ionomer used as a core material.

作者信息

Cooley R L, Robbins J W, Barnwell S

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Dentistry, San Antonio.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Dec;64(6):651-3. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90289-o.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(90)90289-o
PMID:2127806
Abstract

This laboratory study evaluated the dimensional stability of two reinforced glass ionomers (Ketac-Silver and Fuji Miracle Mix) in comparison with amalgam. Ten core build-ups were prepared with each material on extracted human teeth. Four Minim pins were placed in each tooth for retention. A gold casting was made for each core build-up. The specimens were placed in a distilled water and the distance between the casting and the tooth was measured at 1 hour, 6 hours, and then every 24 hours for 7 days. After 7 days, the measured changes were small, ranging from 1 to 63 microns. The reinforced glass ionomers were found to be dimensionally stable in moisture over a period of 7 days.

摘要

这项实验室研究评估了两种增强型玻璃离子水门汀(Ketac-Silver和Fuji Miracle Mix)与汞合金相比的尺寸稳定性。在拔除的人牙上用每种材料制备了10个核桩修复体。每个牙齿中放置4个微型钉以进行固位。为每个核桩修复体制备一个金铸件。将标本置于蒸馏水中,并在1小时、6小时,然后在7天内每24小时测量铸件与牙齿之间的距离。7天后,测量到的变化很小,范围为1至63微米。发现增强型玻璃离子水门汀在7天的时间内在潮湿环境中尺寸稳定。

相似文献

1
Dimensional stability of glass ionomer used as a core material.用作核材料的玻璃离子水门汀的尺寸稳定性。
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Dec;64(6):651-3. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90289-o.
2
Laboratory strength of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements.玻璃离子水门汀和磷酸锌水门汀的实验室强度。
J Prosthodont. 2001 Sep;10(3):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2001.00140.x.
3
Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials.
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Nov;78(5):458-64. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70060-x.
4
In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications.
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Aug;86(2):149-55. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114882.
5
Clinical pilot study on new dental filling materials and preparation procedures in developing countries.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1990 Dec;18(6):309-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1990.tb00086.x.
6
Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.五种桩核修复材料在有或无冠外预备的牙齿上的抗折性
Oper Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):388-94.
7
Compressive strength of some polyalkenoates with or without dental amalgam alloy incorporation.含或不含牙科汞合金的某些聚链烯酸酯的抗压强度。
Dent Mater. 1991 Jul;7(3):151-4. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(91)90034-v.
8
[Comparative investigation of compressive resistance of glass-cermet cements used as a core material in post-core systems].
Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg. 1989 Sep;16(3):413-7.
9
Strength of core build-up materials in endodontically treated teeth.根管治疗后牙齿的核修复材料强度
Am J Dent. 1997 Aug;10(4):166-72.
10
Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns.人工牙冠下桩核修复体的疲劳测试及微观评估
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Sep;82(3):341-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70090-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials - An study.Paracore®、Flourocore®2+和Multicore®树脂核桩修复材料的抗压、抗拉和抗弯强度的比较评估——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;24(6):576-579. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_529_21. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
Comparative study of mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials.直接核桩修复材料力学性能的比较研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;6(1):16-20. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.149285.