Department of Hydroinformatics and Knowledge Management, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands.
Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(3):462-7. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.244.
One-dimensional (1D) hydrodynamic models have been used as a standard industry practice for urban flood modelling work for many years. More recently, however, model formulations have included a 1D representation of the main channels and a 2D representation of the floodplains. Since the physical process of describing exchanges of flows with the floodplains can be represented in different ways, the predictive capability of different modelling approaches can also vary. The present paper explores effects of some of the issues that concern urban flood modelling work. Impacts from applying different model schematisation, geometry and parameter values were investigated. The study has mainly focussed on exploring how different Digital Terrain Model (DTM) resolution, presence of different features on DTM such as roads and building structures and different friction coefficients affect the simulation results. Practical implications of these issues are analysed and illustrated in a case study from St Maarten, N.A. The results from this study aim to provide users of numerical models with information that can be used in the analyses of flooding processes in urban areas.
一维(1D)水动力模型多年来一直被用作城市洪水建模工作的标准行业实践。然而,最近的模型公式已经包括了主要河道的 1D 表示和洪泛区的 2D 表示。由于描述与洪泛区之间的水流交换的物理过程可以用不同的方式表示,因此不同建模方法的预测能力也可能有所不同。本文探讨了一些与城市洪水建模工作有关的问题的影响。研究了应用不同模型图示、几何形状和参数值的影响。该研究主要集中在探索不同数字地形模型(DTM)分辨率、DTM 上存在的不同特征(如道路和建筑物结构)以及不同摩擦系数如何影响模拟结果。在荷属圣马丁岛的案例研究中分析和说明了这些问题的实际影响。本研究的结果旨在为数值模型的用户提供可用于分析城市地区洪水过程的信息。