Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital (Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital), Medical School of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shanxi Province, China,
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jun;67(6):553-62. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-0991-x. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
The effects of diltiazem on 1692 kidney transplant recipients under the immunosuppressive regimen of cyclosporine A (CsA) in combination with either mycophenolate mofetil or azothioprine were assessed. The two treatment groups were compared for blood concentrations of CsA, the extent of acceptable dosage reduction for the maintenance of immunotherapy, potential effects of kidney protection, and promotion of graft function.
We monitored changes of blood concentrations of CsA in the two different patient treatment groups for post-transplant graft function, episodes of acute rejection, and hepatic and renal toxicity in 1640 renal transplant recipients after treatment with diltiazem.
In patients treated with the triple immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, azothioprine, and prednisolone (Pred), the sub-group of patients receiving the diltiazem treatment saw a significantly reduced CsA dosage in comparison to the non-diltiazem group (control group 1) (P < 0.05), but the blood concentrations of CsA of the diltiazem group were higher than those of control group 1 (P < 0.01). Of the patients treated with CsA, mycophenolate mofetil, and Pred, the sub-group of patients also treated with diltiazem showed similar effects: CsA dosage was reduced (P < 0.01) and the blood concentrations of CsA significantly increased (P < 0.01) in comparison with those of control group 2. In addition, recovery time of graft function decreased to 4.7 ± 1.8 days and 3.9 ± 1.4 days in the two diltiazem treatment groups, respectively (P < 0.05), and the rate of acute rejection decreased to 21 (p < 0.05) and 7.9% (P < 0.01), respectively.
In our cohort of renal transplantation patients, co-administration of CsA and diltiazem increased CsA blood concentration, thereby resulting in a reduction in its required dosage treatment, which lightened the patients' economic burden while improving primary and long-term kidney function by promoting the recovery of graft function and decreasing hepatic and renal toxicity. The co-administration of diltiazem may also reduce the rate of acute rejection, especially in patients who also receive the triple immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, mycophenolate mofetil, and Pred.
评估地尔硫卓在环孢素 A(CsA)联合霉酚酸酯或硫唑嘌呤免疫抑制方案下对 1692 例肾移植受者的影响。比较两组患者的 CsA 血药浓度、维持免疫治疗的可接受剂量减少程度、潜在的肾脏保护作用和移植物功能促进作用。
我们监测了 1640 例肾移植受者在使用地尔硫卓治疗后的移植后移植物功能、急性排斥发作和肝肾功能毒性变化,比较了两组不同患者的 CsA 血药浓度变化。
在接受 CsA、硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松龙(Pred)三联免疫抑制方案治疗的患者中,接受地尔硫卓治疗的亚组患者与未接受地尔硫卓治疗的患者(对照组 1)相比,CsA 剂量显著减少(P < 0.05),但地尔硫卓组的 CsA 血药浓度高于对照组 1(P < 0.01)。在接受 CsA、霉酚酸酯和 Pred 治疗的患者中,接受地尔硫卓治疗的亚组患者也表现出类似的效果:CsA 剂量减少(P < 0.01),CsA 血药浓度显著升高(P < 0.01)与对照组 2 相比。此外,两组地尔硫卓治疗组的移植物功能恢复时间分别缩短至 4.7 ± 1.8 天和 3.9 ± 1.4 天(P < 0.05),急性排斥反应发生率分别降低至 21%(P < 0.05)和 7.9%(P < 0.01)。
在我们的肾移植患者队列中,CsA 与地尔硫卓联合使用增加了 CsA 的血药浓度,从而减少了其所需的剂量治疗,减轻了患者的经济负担,同时通过促进移植物功能的恢复和降低肝肾功能毒性,改善了原发性和长期肾功能。地尔硫卓的联合使用还可能降低急性排斥反应的发生率,特别是在接受 CsA、霉酚酸酯和 Pred 三联免疫抑制方案的患者中。