Skrablin S, Grgic O, Mihaljevic S, Blajic J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(2):134-8. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.542840.
In this study, 205 nulliparous parturients were enrolled to receive either intermittent (n = 101) or continuous (n = 104) type of epidural analgesia in labour. The primary outcome was rate of caesarean deliveries, whereas secondary outcomes included rate of fundal pressure manoeuvres, duration of labour from application of analgesia, dose of anaesthetic and short-term maternal and neonatal outcome between two groups. Rate of caesarean deliveries was significantly increased in the continuous group (15/104 vs 5/101, p = 0.02), as well as rate of fundal pressure manoeuvres (24/104 vs 11/101, p = 0.02) and dose of fentanyl (100 [100-300] vs 187.5 [125-450] μg, p < 0.001 and levobupivacaine (40 [40-60] vs 75 [50-90] ml, p < 0.001). Duration of labour from analgesia to delivery was not significantly different between the two groups (414 ± 101 vs 432 ± 94 min, p = 0.12).
在本研究中,招募了205名未产妇接受分娩时的间歇性硬膜外镇痛(n = 101)或持续性硬膜外镇痛(n = 104)。主要结局是剖宫产率,次要结局包括宫底加压操作率、从应用镇痛到分娩的产程时长、麻醉剂量以及两组间的短期母婴结局。持续性硬膜外镇痛组的剖宫产率显著升高(15/104 vs 5/101,p = 0.02),宫底加压操作率(24/104 vs 11/101,p = 0.02)以及芬太尼剂量(100 [100 - 300] vs 187.5 [125 - 450] μg,p < 0.001)和左旋布比卡因剂量(40 [40 - 60] vs 75 [50 - 90] ml,p < 0.001)也显著升高。两组从镇痛到分娩的产程时长无显著差异(414 ± 101 vs 432 ± 94分钟,p = 0.12)。