Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Indoor Air. 2011 Jun;21(3):205-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00713.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
In the two decades since the first issue of Indoor Air, there have been over 250 peer-reviewed publications addressing chemical reactions among indoor pollutants. The present review has assembled and categorized these publications. It begins with a brief account of the state of our knowledge in 1991 regarding 'indoor chemistry', much of which came from corrosion and art conservation studies. It then outlines what we have learned in the period between 1991 and 2010 in the context of the major reference categories: gas-phase chemistry, surface chemistry, health effects and reviews/workshops. The indoor reactions that have received the greatest attention are those involving ozone-with terpenoids in the gas-phase as well as with the surfaces of common materials, furnishings, and the occupants themselves. It has become clear that surface reactions often have a larger impact on indoor settings than do gas-phase processes. This review concludes with a subjective list of major research needs going forward, including more information on the decomposition of common indoor pollutants, better understanding of how sorbed water influences surface reactions, and further identification of short-lived products of indoor chemistry. Arguably, the greatest need is for increased knowledge regarding the impact that indoor chemistry has on the health and comfort of building occupants.
Indoor chemistry changes the type and concentration of chemicals present in indoor environments. In the past, products of indoor chemistry were often overlooked, reflecting a focus on stable, relatively non-polar organic compounds coupled with the use of sampling and analytical methods that were unable to 'see' many of the products of such chemistry. Today, researchers who study indoor environments are more aware of the potential for chemistry to occur. Awareness is valuable, because it leads to the use of sampling methods and analytical tools that can detect changes in indoor environments resulting from chemical processes. This, in turn, leads to a more complete understanding of occupants' chemical exposures, potential links between these exposures and adverse health effects and, finally, steps that might be taken to mitigate these adverse effects.
自《室内空气》第一期出版以来的二十年中,已有超过 250 篇同行评议的出版物涉及室内污染物之间的化学反应。本综述汇集并分类了这些出版物。它首先简要介绍了 1991 年我们对“室内化学”的了解状况,其中大部分来自腐蚀和艺术保护研究。然后,它概述了我们在 1991 年至 2010 年期间在主要参考类别(气相化学、表面化学、健康影响和综述/研讨会)方面所学到的知识。受到最多关注的室内反应是涉及臭氧的反应,包括气相中的萜烯以及常见材料、家具和居住者本身的表面。显然,表面反应对室内环境的影响通常比气相过程更大。本综述最后列出了未来主要的研究需求清单,包括更多关于常见室内污染物分解的信息、更好地了解被吸附水如何影响表面反应,以及进一步确定室内化学的短寿命产物。可以说,最大的需求是增加对室内化学对建筑居住者健康和舒适度的影响的了解。
室内化学改变了室内环境中存在的化学物质的类型和浓度。过去,室内化学的产物往往被忽视,这反映了人们对稳定、相对非极性有机化合物的关注,以及使用无法“看到”许多此类化学产物的采样和分析方法。如今,研究室内环境的研究人员更加意识到发生化学变化的可能性。意识是有价值的,因为它导致使用可以检测到化学过程导致的室内环境变化的采样方法和分析工具。这反过来又导致对居住者化学暴露的更全面了解,这些暴露与不良健康影响之间的潜在联系,以及最终可能采取的减轻这些不利影响的措施。