Department of Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Ain Shams Faculty of Medicine, University of Ain Shams, Cairo, Egypt.
Liver Int. 2011 Mar;31(3):401-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02435.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
The therapy of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 (HCV-4) has not been optimized yet. This randomized, prospective, parallel-group clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α-2a (PEG-IFN α-2a) plus ribavirin and PEG-IFN α-2b plus ribavirin and assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with chronic HCV-4.
Eligible patients with proven chronic HCV-4 were randomized to receive either a weekly dose of PEG-IFN α-2a (180 μg) or PEG-IFN α-2b (1.5 μg/kg) and a daily dose of ribavirin (1000-1200 mg) for 48 weeks with 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) defined by undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment. The Short form-36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) and the Chronic Liver Disease questionnaires (CLDQ) were assessed before, during and after therapy.
The overall SVR rate of the entire cohort was 59.9%. The SVR rates were significantly higher in patients treated with PEG-IFN α-2a and ribavirin (Group A; n=109) compared with those treated with PEG-IFN α-2b and ribavirin (Group B; n=108, 70.6 vs. 54.6%, respectively; P=0.017). The relapse rates were 5.1% for PEG-IFN α-2a and 15.7% for PEG-IFN α-2b (P=0.0019). The SF-36v2 and CLDQ were low during therapy and improved significantly after therapy successful therapy.
Pegylated interferon α-2a plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than PEG-IFN α-2b and ribavirin therapy in the treatment of chronic HCV-4 patients. The tolerability and adverse events were comparable between the two regimens. The HRQOL improved significantly after successful PEG-IFN α-2a plus ribavirin therapy.
慢性丙型肝炎基因型 4(HCV-4)的治疗尚未得到优化。本随机、前瞻性、平行组临床试验比较了聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2a(PEG-IFN α-2a)联合利巴韦林与聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2b 联合利巴韦林治疗慢性 HCV-4 的疗效和安全性,并评估了患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。
纳入的经证实患有慢性 HCV-4 的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受每周一次的 PEG-IFN α-2a(180 μg)或 PEG-IFN α-2b(1.5 μg/kg)联合每日利巴韦林(1000-1200 mg)治疗 48 周,治疗后随访 24 周。主要终点为治疗后 24 周时 HCV RNA 不可检测的持续病毒学应答(SVR)。在治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后使用健康调查简表 36 项版本 2(SF-36v2)和慢性肝病问卷(CLDQ)进行评估。
整个队列的总体 SVR 率为 59.9%。PEG-IFN α-2a 和利巴韦林治疗组(A 组,n=109)的 SVR 率明显高于 PEG-IFN α-2b 和利巴韦林治疗组(B 组,n=108),分别为 70.6%和 54.6%(P=0.017)。A 组和 B 组的复发率分别为 5.1%和 15.7%(P=0.0019)。SF-36v2 和 CLDQ 在治疗期间较低,治疗成功后显著改善。
聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2a 联合利巴韦林治疗慢性 HCV-4 患者的疗效明显优于 PEG-IFN α-2b 联合利巴韦林治疗,两种方案的耐受性和不良反应相当。聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2a 联合利巴韦林治疗成功后,HRQOL 显著改善。