Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2a 治疗慢性丙型肝炎基因型 4A 的随机试验及生活质量分析:优于聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林的疗效。

Enhanced efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2a over pegylated interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4A randomized trial and quality of life analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Ain Shams Faculty of Medicine, University of Ain Shams, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Liver Int. 2011 Mar;31(3):401-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02435.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

Abstract

AIM

The therapy of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 (HCV-4) has not been optimized yet. This randomized, prospective, parallel-group clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α-2a (PEG-IFN α-2a) plus ribavirin and PEG-IFN α-2b plus ribavirin and assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with chronic HCV-4.

METHODS

Eligible patients with proven chronic HCV-4 were randomized to receive either a weekly dose of PEG-IFN α-2a (180 μg) or PEG-IFN α-2b (1.5 μg/kg) and a daily dose of ribavirin (1000-1200 mg) for 48 weeks with 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) defined by undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment. The Short form-36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) and the Chronic Liver Disease questionnaires (CLDQ) were assessed before, during and after therapy.

RESULTS

The overall SVR rate of the entire cohort was 59.9%. The SVR rates were significantly higher in patients treated with PEG-IFN α-2a and ribavirin (Group A; n=109) compared with those treated with PEG-IFN α-2b and ribavirin (Group B; n=108, 70.6 vs. 54.6%, respectively; P=0.017). The relapse rates were 5.1% for PEG-IFN α-2a and 15.7% for PEG-IFN α-2b (P=0.0019). The SF-36v2 and CLDQ were low during therapy and improved significantly after therapy successful therapy.

CONCLUSION

Pegylated interferon α-2a plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than PEG-IFN α-2b and ribavirin therapy in the treatment of chronic HCV-4 patients. The tolerability and adverse events were comparable between the two regimens. The HRQOL improved significantly after successful PEG-IFN α-2a plus ribavirin therapy.

摘要

目的

慢性丙型肝炎基因型 4(HCV-4)的治疗尚未得到优化。本随机、前瞻性、平行组临床试验比较了聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2a(PEG-IFN α-2a)联合利巴韦林与聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2b 联合利巴韦林治疗慢性 HCV-4 的疗效和安全性,并评估了患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。

方法

纳入的经证实患有慢性 HCV-4 的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受每周一次的 PEG-IFN α-2a(180 μg)或 PEG-IFN α-2b(1.5 μg/kg)联合每日利巴韦林(1000-1200 mg)治疗 48 周,治疗后随访 24 周。主要终点为治疗后 24 周时 HCV RNA 不可检测的持续病毒学应答(SVR)。在治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后使用健康调查简表 36 项版本 2(SF-36v2)和慢性肝病问卷(CLDQ)进行评估。

结果

整个队列的总体 SVR 率为 59.9%。PEG-IFN α-2a 和利巴韦林治疗组(A 组,n=109)的 SVR 率明显高于 PEG-IFN α-2b 和利巴韦林治疗组(B 组,n=108),分别为 70.6%和 54.6%(P=0.017)。A 组和 B 组的复发率分别为 5.1%和 15.7%(P=0.0019)。SF-36v2 和 CLDQ 在治疗期间较低,治疗成功后显著改善。

结论

聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2a 联合利巴韦林治疗慢性 HCV-4 患者的疗效明显优于 PEG-IFN α-2b 联合利巴韦林治疗,两种方案的耐受性和不良反应相当。聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2a 联合利巴韦林治疗成功后,HRQOL 显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验