Suppr超能文献

常规无菌手套对血培养污染率的影响:一项整群随机试验。

Effect of routine sterile gloving on contamination rates in blood culture: a cluster randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-Dong, Chongro-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):145-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood culture contamination leads to inappropriate or unnecessary antibiotic use. However, practical guidelines are inconsistent about the routine use of sterile gloving in collection of blood for culture.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the routine use of sterile gloving before venipuncture reduces blood culture contamination rates.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized, assessor-blinded, crossover trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00973063).

SETTING

Single-center trial involving medical wards and the intensive care unit.

PARTICIPANTS

64 interns in charge of collection of blood for culture were randomly assigned to routine-to-optional or optional-to-routine sterile gloving groups for 1854 adult patients who needed blood cultures.

INTERVENTION

During routine sterile gloving, the interns wore sterile gloves every time before venipuncture, but during optional sterile gloving, sterile gloves were worn only if needed.

MEASUREMENTS

Isolates from single positive blood cultures were classified as likely contaminant, possible contaminant, or true pathogen. Contamination rates were compared by using generalized mixed models.

RESULTS

A total of 10 520 blood cultures were analyzed: 5265 from the routine sterile gloving period and 5255 from the optional sterile gloving period. When possible contaminants were included, the contamination rate was 0.6% in routine sterile gloving and 1.1% in optional sterile gloving (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.87]; P = 0.009). When only likely contaminants were included, the contamination rate was 0.5% in routine sterile gloving and 0.9% in optional sterile gloving (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51 [CI, 0.31 to 0.83]; P = 0.007).

LIMITATION

Blood cultures from the emergency department, surgical wards, and pediatric wards were not assessed.

CONCLUSION

Routine sterile gloving before venipuncture may reduce blood culture contamination.

摘要

背景

血培养污染会导致不适当或不必要的抗生素使用。然而,实用指南对于在采集血培养标本时常规使用无菌手套存在不一致性。

目的

确定静脉穿刺前常规使用无菌手套是否会降低血培养污染率。

设计

整群随机、评估者设盲、交叉试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT00973063)。

设置

涉及医疗病房和重症监护病房的单中心试验。

参与者

64 名负责采集血培养标本的实习医生被随机分配至常规-可选或可选-常规无菌手套组,共纳入 1854 名需要血培养的成年患者。

干预

在常规使用无菌手套时,实习医生每次静脉穿刺前都要戴无菌手套,但在可选使用无菌手套时,只有在需要时才戴无菌手套。

测量

从单份阳性血培养物中分离出的培养物被归类为可能的污染菌、疑似污染菌或真正的病原体。使用广义混合模型比较污染率。

结果

共分析了 10520 份血培养标本:常规无菌手套组 5265 份,可选无菌手套组 5255 份。当包括可能的污染菌时,常规无菌手套组的污染率为 0.6%,可选无菌手套组为 1.1%(调整后的优势比,0.57[95%CI,0.37 至 0.87];P=0.009)。当仅包括可能的污染菌时,常规无菌手套组的污染率为 0.5%,可选无菌手套组为 0.9%(调整后的优势比,0.51[CI,0.31 至 0.83];P=0.007)。

局限性

未评估急诊科、外科病房和儿科病房的血培养标本。

结论

静脉穿刺前常规使用无菌手套可能会降低血培养污染率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验