Archibald Lennox K, Pallangyo Kisali, Kazembe Peter, Reller L Barth
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA, and Lilongwe Central Hospital, Malawi.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Dec;44(12):4425-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01215-06. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
We conducted retrospective, comparative analyses of contamination rates for cultures of blood obtained in the emergency rooms of Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Lilongwe Central Hospital (LCH) in central Malawi; and the Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) in the United States. None of the emergency room patients had indwelling intravascular devices at the time that the blood samples for cultures were obtained. In addition, we reviewed the contamination rates for a cohort of patients already hospitalized in the DUMC inpatient medical service, most of whom had indwelling intravascular devices. The bloodstream infection rates among the patients at MNH (n=513) and LCH (n=486) were similar (approximately 28%); the contamination rates at the two hospitals were 1.3% (7/513) and 0.8% (4/486), respectively. Of 54 microorganisms isolated from cultures of blood collected in the DUMC emergency room, 26 (48%) were identified as skin contaminants. Cultures of blood collected in the DUMC emergency room were significantly more likely to yield growth of contaminants than the cultures of blood collected in the emergency rooms at MNH and LCH combined (26/332 versus 11/1,003; P<0.0001) or collected in the DUMC inpatient medical service (26/332 versus 7/283; P<0.01). For the MNH and LCH blood cultures, lower contamination rates were observed when skin was disinfected with isopropyl alcohol plus tincture of iodine rather than isopropyl alcohol plus povidone-iodine. In conclusion, blood culture contamination was minimized in sub-Saharan African hospitals with substantially limited resources through scrupulous attention to aseptic skin cleansing and improved venipuncture techniques. Application of these principles when blood samples for culture are obtained in U.S. hospital emergency rooms should help mitigate blood culture contamination rates and the unnecessary microbiology workup of skin contaminants.
我们对坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的穆希姆比利国家医院(MNH)、马拉维中部的利隆圭中心医院(LCH)以及美国杜克大学医学中心(DUMC)急诊室采集的血培养污染率进行了回顾性比较分析。在采集血培养样本时,这些急诊室患者均无留置血管内装置。此外,我们还回顾了DUMC住院内科服务中一组已住院患者的污染率,其中大多数患者有留置血管内装置。MNH(n = 513)和LCH(n = 486)患者的血流感染率相似(约28%);两家医院的污染率分别为1.3%(7/513)和0.8%(4/486)。从DUMC急诊室采集的血培养物中分离出的54种微生物中,有26种(48%)被鉴定为皮肤污染物。DUMC急诊室采集的血培养物比MNH和LCH急诊室联合采集的血培养物(26/332对11/1003;P<0.0001)或DUMC住院内科服务采集的血培养物(26/332对7/283;P<0.01)更易产生污染物生长。对于MNH和LCH的血培养,用异丙醇加碘酊消毒皮肤时观察到的污染率低于用异丙醇加聚维酮碘消毒皮肤时的污染率。总之,通过严格注意无菌皮肤清洁和改进静脉穿刺技术,撒哈拉以南非洲资源极为有限的医院将血培养污染降至最低。在美国医院急诊室采集血培养样本时应用这些原则应有助于降低血培养污染率以及减少对皮肤污染物不必要的微生物学检查。