Wilson J, Bajwa A, Kamath V, Rangan A
North West Deanery, 3 Piccadilly Place, Manchester M1 3BN, UK.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Feb;93(2):245-50. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.24613.
Compression and absolute stability are important in the management of intra-articular fractures. We compared tension band wiring with plate fixation for the treatment of fractures of the olecranon by measuring compression within the fracture. Identical transverse fractures were created in models of the ulna. Tension band wires were applied to ten fractures and ten were fixed with Acumed plates. Compression was measured using a Tekscan force transducer within the fracture gap. Dynamic testing was carried out by reproducing cyclical contraction of the triceps of 20 N and of the brachialis of 10 N. Both methods were tested on each sample. Paired t-tests compared overall compression and compression at the articular side of the fracture. The mean compression for plating was 819 N (sd 602, 95% confidence interval (CI)) and for tension band wiring was 77 N (sd 19, 95% CI) (p = 0.039). The mean compression on the articular side of the fracture for plating was 343 N (sd 276, 95% CI) and for tension band wiring was 1 N (sd 2, 95% CI) (p = 0.038). During simulated movements, the mean compression was reduced in both groups, with tension band wiring at -14 N (sd 7) and for plating -173 N (sd 32). No increase in compression on the articular side was detected in the tension band wiring group. Pre-contoured plates provide significantly greater compression than tension bands in the treatment of transverse fractures of the olecranon, both over the whole fracture and specifically at the articular side of the fracture. In tension band wiring the overall compression was reduced and articular compression remained negligible during simulated contraction of the triceps, challenging the tension band principle.
加压和绝对稳定性在关节内骨折的治疗中很重要。我们通过测量骨折部位的压力,比较了张力带钢丝固定术和钢板固定术治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折的效果。在尺骨模型上制造相同的横行骨折。对10处骨折应用张力带钢丝,另外10处用Acumed钢板固定。使用Tekscan力传感器测量骨折间隙内的压力。通过模拟20 N的肱三头肌和10 N的肱肌的周期性收缩进行动态测试。对每个样本都测试了这两种方法。采用配对t检验比较整体压力以及骨折关节侧的压力。钢板固定的平均压力为819 N(标准差602,95%置信区间[CI]),张力带钢丝固定为77 N(标准差19,95%CI)(p = 0.039)。骨折关节侧钢板固定的平均压力为343 N(标准差276,95%CI),张力带钢丝固定为1 N(标准差2,95%CI)(p = 0.038)。在模拟运动过程中,两组的平均压力均降低,张力带钢丝固定组为-14 N(标准差7),钢板固定组为-173 N(标准差32)。张力带钢丝固定组未检测到关节侧压力增加。在治疗尺骨鹰嘴横行骨折时,预塑形钢板在整个骨折部位,特别是在骨折关节侧,提供的压力明显大于张力带。在张力带钢丝固定中,肱三头肌模拟收缩时整体压力降低,关节压力仍然可以忽略不计,这对张力带原理提出了挑战。