Wang Ting, Dack Charlotte, McHugh Louise, Whelan Robert
Psychology Department, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
Learn Behav. 2011 Sep;39(3):224-38. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0020-z.
The present set of experiments tested the hypothesis that the nodal number effects observed in previous studies of stimulus equivalence were due to the confounding factor of training structure that resulted in unequal reinforcement across trial types. In Experiment 1, two 5-member equivalence classes were trained across equal and unequal reinforcement conditions, both with and without a limited hold. A significant nodal effect, as measured by response speed, was found in the equal reinforcement, no-limited-hold condition. In Experiment 2, two 6-member equivalence classes were trained in equal and unequal reinforcement conditions without limited hold. In a transfer-of-function test, clear nodal effects were observed in the equal reinforcement condition. Experiment 3 replicated and extended the findings of Experiments 1 and 2 with an increased number of baseline training trials. The results of the present study suggest that the effects of nodal number are independent of differential reinforcement. Furthermore, a transfer-of-function test was most sensitive to nodal effects, response speed was the next most sensitive measure, and response accuracy was the least sensitive measure of nodal effects.
在先前刺激等效性研究中观察到的节点数量效应是由于训练结构的混杂因素导致不同试验类型的强化不均。在实验1中,在有和没有限时的情况下,在相等和不相等强化条件下训练了两个由5个成员组成的等效类。在相等强化、无限时条件下,以反应速度衡量发现了显著的节点效应。在实验2中,在相等和不相等强化条件下训练了两个由6个成员组成的等效类,没有限时。在功能转移测试中,在相等强化条件下观察到了明显的节点效应。实验3通过增加基线训练试验的数量重复并扩展了实验1和2的结果。本研究结果表明,节点数量的效应与差异强化无关。此外,功能转移测试对节点效应最敏感,反应速度是其次敏感的测量指标,而反应准确性是对节点效应最不敏感的测量指标。