Tsuboi Masaki, Hasegawa Yukiharu, Fujita Kanji, Kawabe Kiyoharu
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aichi-ken Saiseikai Hospital, 1-1-18 Sakou, Nishi-ku, Nagoya, 451-0052, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2011 Jan;16(1):38-43. doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-0010-6. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
Although there have been several reports on the complications of periacetabular osteotomy, stress fractures occurring in the pubic and ischial bones are less well recognised. The purpose of this study was to analyse the incidence of stress fracture, factors and treatment outcomes of stress fractures in the pubic/ischial bone after eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy (ERAO).
We examined 340 hips of 290 patients (male 35 hips, female 305 hips; mean age 42 years) with whom it was possible to conduct a minimum of 1 year of follow-up observations after ERAO. The following items were investigated: presence of a pubic/ischial stress fracture after surgery; gender; age; bilateral or unilateral osteoarthritis; height, weight and body mass index; preoperative and final stages of osteoarthritis of the hip; preoperative and final center-edge (CE) angle, acetabular head index and minimum joint space; preoperative and final Japan Orthopaedic Association score; and presence of a pubic discontinuity. We then compared cases with pubic/ischial stress fracture (fractured group) with those with no fracture (nonfractured group). For the fractured group, we also investigated the onset time of the fracture.
The fractured group consisted entirely of women with a mean age of 47 years, and comprised 10 (2.9%) of the 340 patient hips examined. A statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in pubic discontinuities (fractured group 8/10, nonfractured group 16/330; P < 0.0001) and postoperative CE angle (fractured group; 43°, nonfractured group; 36°, P = 0.0338) according to univariate analysis. However, only the pubic discontinuity rate differed significantly between the groups according to multivariate analysis (P < 0.0001). In all cases, a pubic/ischial stress fracture occurred within 3 months after surgery, and all cases had bony union. Recurrent fracture occurred in only one hip. There was no difference in the clinical outcomes of the fractured and nonfractured groups at the time of final follow-up.
The patients with pubic discontinuities were significantly more susceptible to a pubic/ischial stress fracture after ERAO. The presence of a pubic/ischial stress fracture did not influence the clinical outcome.
尽管已有多篇关于髋臼周围截骨术并发症的报道,但耻骨和坐骨应力性骨折的情况仍未得到充分认识。本研究旨在分析偏心旋转髋臼截骨术(ERAO)后耻骨/坐骨应力性骨折的发生率、相关因素及治疗结果。
我们对290例患者的340髋(男性35髋,女性305髋;平均年龄42岁)进行了研究,这些患者在ERAO术后至少随访了1年。研究项目包括:术后耻骨/坐骨应力性骨折的情况;性别;年龄;双侧或单侧骨关节炎;身高、体重和体重指数;髋关节骨关节炎的术前和最终阶段;术前和最终的中心边缘(CE)角、髋臼头指数和最小关节间隙;术前和最终的日本骨科协会评分;以及耻骨连续性中断情况。然后我们将发生耻骨/坐骨应力性骨折的病例(骨折组)与未发生骨折的病例(非骨折组)进行比较。对于骨折组,我们还调查了骨折的发生时间。
骨折组全部为女性,平均年龄47岁,在340例接受检查的患者髋部中占10例(2.9%)。单因素分析显示,两组在耻骨连续性中断情况(骨折组8/10,非骨折组16/330;P<0.0001)和术后CE角(骨折组43°,非骨折组36°,P=0.0338)方面存在统计学显著差异。然而,多因素分析显示,两组间仅耻骨连续性中断率存在显著差异(P<0.0001)。所有病例的耻骨/坐骨应力性骨折均发生在术后3个月内,且所有病例均实现了骨愈合。仅1髋发生了再骨折。最终随访时,骨折组和非骨折组的临床结果无差异。
耻骨连续性中断的患者在ERAO后发生耻骨/坐骨应力性骨折的易感性显著更高。耻骨/坐骨应力性骨折的存在并不影响临床结果。