Department of Political Science and Public Affairs, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA.
J Psychol. 2011 Jan-Feb;145(1):23-37. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2010.528074.
College sophomores feature prominently in social scientific research but are frequently criticized for providing unrepresentative, invalid, and unreliable data. Using the case of personality and politics, the present authors evaluated those critiques, concluding that college sophomores are not representative of the general adult population on all 5 factors of personality. Despite this limitation, analyses show that the relationship between personality and political opinions is virtually identical for college students and a comparison group of adults. Further, a range of reliability statistics suggests that college students provide reliable data on personality. College students are not a panacea for the problems of participant recruiting, but they should not be discounted as unreliable and invalid, either. In many cases, the so-called "college-sophomore problem" is not a problem.
大二学生在社会科学研究中扮演着重要的角色,但他们经常因其提供的不具代表性、无效和不可靠的数据而受到批评。本研究以人格与政治为例,评估了这些批评,得出结论:大二学生在人格的所有 5 个因素上都不具有代表性。尽管存在这种局限性,但分析表明,人格与政治观点之间的关系对于大学生和成年人的比较组几乎是相同的。此外,一系列可靠性统计数据表明,大学生在人格方面提供了可靠的数据。大学生并不是解决参与者招募问题的灵丹妙药,但也不应该被视为不可靠和无效。在许多情况下,所谓的“大二学生问题”并不是一个问题。