• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

70 基因 MammaPrint 检测在淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of 70-gene MammaPrint signature in node-negative breast cancer.

机构信息

Quorum Consulting, Inc, 180 Sansome St, 10th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec 1;16(12):e333-42.

PMID:21291290
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 70-gene MammaPrint signature (Agendia Inc, Huntington Beach, CA) vs Adjuvant! Online software (AS) (http://www.adjuvantonline.com) in patients 60 years or younger with early-stage breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses from a US payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model with 3 health states was constructed. In the base case model, risk classification and patient outcomes were based on a 70-gene signature validation study. Efficacy of chemotherapy was derived from a published meta-analysis of clinical trials. An alternative model using data from AS and from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry was built to examine the external validity of the base case model. The incremental benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of treatment guided by 70-gene signature were calculated.

RESULTS

In the base case model, 70-gene signature reclassified 29% of patients and spared 10% of patients from chemotherapy. Compared with the AS strategy, the 70-gene signature strategy was associated with $1440 higher total cost per patient and with 0.14 additional life-year or 0.15 additional quality-adjusted life-year. Overall, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were approximately $10,000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year in the base case model and $700 in the alternative model. The model results were sensitive to estrogen receptor status, the proportion of patients classified as high risk vs low risk, and the overall survival in each risk group.

CONCLUSION

A 70-gene signature is likely to be a cost-effective strategy to guide adjuvant chemotherapy treatment in younger patients with early-stage breast cancer.

摘要

目的

评估 70 基因 MammaPrint 特征(加利福尼亚州亨廷顿海滩的 Agendia 公司)与 Adjuvant!在线软件(AS)(http://www.adjuvantonline.com)在 60 岁及以下早期乳腺癌患者中的成本效益。

研究设计

从美国支付者的角度进行成本效益和成本效用分析。

方法

构建了一个具有 3 种健康状态的马尔可夫模型。在基础模型中,风险分类和患者结局基于 70 基因特征验证研究。化疗的疗效来自对临床试验的已发表荟萃分析。构建了一个使用 AS 和监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处数据的替代模型,以检验基础模型的外部有效性。计算了基于 70 基因特征的治疗的增量收益、成本和成本效益。

结果

在基础模型中,70 基因特征重新分类了 29%的患者,并使 10%的患者免于化疗。与 AS 策略相比,70 基因特征策略与每位患者 1440 美元的总成本增加和 0.14 个额外的寿命年或 0.15 个额外的质量调整寿命年相关。总体而言,基础模型中的增量成本效益比约为每寿命年或质量调整寿命年 10000 美元,替代模型中为 700 美元。模型结果对雌激素受体状态、高风险与低风险患者的比例以及每个风险组的总体生存率敏感。

结论

70 基因特征可能是一种指导年轻早期乳腺癌患者辅助化疗治疗的具有成本效益的策略。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of 70-gene MammaPrint signature in node-negative breast cancer.70 基因 MammaPrint 检测在淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中的成本效益。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec 1;16(12):e333-42.
2
Cost-effectiveness of the 70-gene signature versus St. Gallen guidelines and Adjuvant Online for early breast cancer.70 基因签名与圣加仑指南和 Adjuvant Online 在早期乳腺癌中的成本效益比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 May;46(8):1382-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.035. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
3
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.他莫昔芬辅助治疗5年后,来曲唑延长辅助治疗对绝经后早期乳腺癌女性的成本效益分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Jul;12(7):374-86.
4
Genomic profile of breast cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.乳腺癌的基因组概况:从西班牙国家医疗保健系统角度进行的成本效益分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Dec;14(6):889-99. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.957185. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
5
Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of genomic profiling in breast cancer.乳腺癌基因谱分析的前瞻性成本效益分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Dec;49(18):3773-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
6
Economic analysis of gene expression profile data to guide adjuvant treatment in women with early-stage breast cancer.基因表达谱数据的经济分析以指导早期乳腺癌女性的辅助治疗。
Cancer Invest. 2009 Dec;27(10):953-9. doi: 10.3109/07357900903275217.
7
Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.基因表达谱分析在早期乳腺癌中的成本效益:决策分析模型。
Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5163-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27443. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
8
Is adjuvant therapy for older patients with node (+) early breast cancer cost-effective?辅助治疗对老年淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌患者是否具有成本效益?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Nov;94(2):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-8267-0.
9
Integrated gene expression profile predicts prognosis of breast cancer patients.综合基因表达谱可预测乳腺癌患者的预后。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jan;113(2):231-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9925-4. Epub 2008 Feb 16.
10
Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.日本高危早期乳腺癌患者强化化疗联合预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子的经济学评价。
Clin Ther. 2010 Feb;32(2):311-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.01.029.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Oncotype DX from a Brazilian private medicine perspective: a GBECAM multicenter retrospective study.从巴西私立医疗角度看Oncotype DX的成本效益分析:一项GBECAM多中心回顾性研究
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Dec 26;14:17588359221141760. doi: 10.1177/17588359221141760. eCollection 2022.
2
Concordance between Ki-67 index in invasive breast cancer and molecular signatures: EndoPredict and MammaPrint.浸润性乳腺癌中Ki-67指数与分子特征的一致性:EndoPredict和MammaPrint。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;17(3):132. doi: 10.3892/mco.2022.2565. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.
早期浸润性乳腺癌的基因表达谱检测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(10):1-234. eCollection 2020.
4
Prospective, multicenter study on the economic and clinical impact of gene-expression assays in early-stage breast cancer from a single region: the PREGECAM registry experience.前瞻性、多中心研究:来自单一地区的早期乳腺癌中基因表达检测的经济和临床影响:PREGECAM 登记研究经验。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 May;22(5):717-724. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02176-x. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌中基因表达谱的临床实用性。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;14(10):595-610. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.74. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
Towards decision-making using individualized risk estimates for personalized medicine: A systematic review of genomic classifiers of solid tumors.迈向使用个性化风险评估进行精准医疗决策:实体瘤基因组分类器的系统综述
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176388. eCollection 2017.
7
Clinical utility of gene-expression profiling in women with early breast cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.基因表达谱在早期乳腺癌女性中的临床应用:系统评价综述
Genet Med. 2015 Jul;17(7):519-32. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.140. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
8
Far beyond the usual biomarkers in breast cancer: a review.远超越乳腺癌的常规生物标志物:综述。
J Cancer. 2014 Jul 4;5(7):559-71. doi: 10.7150/jca.8925. eCollection 2014.
9
Diagnostic tests based on gene expression profile in breast cancer: from background to clinical use.基于基因表达谱的乳腺癌诊断测试:从背景到临床应用
Tumour Biol. 2014 Sep;35(9):8461-70. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2366-2. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
10
Modern Risk Assessment for Individualizing Treatment Concepts in Early-stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌个体化治疗方案的现代风险评估
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(3-4):165-73.