Rehabilitation Institute, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.
Behav Ther. 2011 Mar;42(1):30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
Fifty-six active treatment team members in long-term nursing care facilities completed an online survey assessing treatment acceptability of modern behavioral, pharmacological, and sensory interventions. A traditional treatment acceptability rating scale was compared to treatment selections in a paired-options format. Unlike earlier research, there were no significant differences in acceptability between the 3 interventions on the traditional rating scale. However, ratings and selections were significantly correlated for behavioral and pharmacological interventions. The clinical significance of such relations and the implications for the use of treatment ratings is discussed.
56 名长期护理机构的积极治疗团队成员完成了一项在线调查，评估了现代行为、药理学和感官干预措施的治疗可接受性。传统的治疗可接受性评定量表与配对选项格式中的治疗选择进行了比较。与早期研究不同，传统评定量表上 3 种干预措施的可接受性之间没有显著差异。然而，行为和药理学干预措施的评分和选择显著相关。讨论了这种关系的临床意义以及对治疗评分使用的影响。
