• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于降落伞和患者护理:行动呼吁。

Of parachutes and patient care: a call to action.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.020. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.020
PMID:21292231
Abstract

Obstetric caregivers are plagued with lawsuits alleging negligence for suboptimal outcomes. Some of those claims are unjustified, but many have merit. We are obligated to create systems designed to minimize the potential for errors that harm our patients. A variety of safety initiatives have been shown to improve patient outcomes in several centers in the United States, but it has been difficult to document the expected association between those results and reduced liability premiums. Furthermore, some individuals and institutions have been reluctant to adopt safety tools such as electronic fetal monitoring certification for all staff working on their Labor and Delivery floor, protocols for managing common clinical scenarios, simulation drills for dealing with uncommon dangerous events, and pre-procedure checklists because of the paucity of evidence based data documenting the effectiveness of those approaches. It is time to move forward with these and other safety initiatives in a serious national attempt to eliminate all preventable adverse patient outcomes in our specialty.

摘要

产科护理人员因治疗效果不佳而被起诉疏忽,有些指控是没有根据的,但也有很多是合理的。我们有责任建立旨在最大限度减少伤害患者的潜在错误的系统。在美国的多个中心,各种安全措施已被证明可以改善患者的预后,但很难证明这些结果与降低责任保险费之间存在预期的关联。此外,由于缺乏基于证据的有效数据来证明这些方法的效果,一些个人和机构一直不愿意采用安全工具,如对所有在产房工作的员工进行电子胎儿监护认证、管理常见临床情况的方案、处理罕见危险事件的模拟演练,以及术前检查表。现在是时候在全国范围内认真推进这些和其他安全措施,以努力消除我们专业领域的所有可预防的不良患者预后。

相似文献

1
Of parachutes and patient care: a call to action.关于降落伞和患者护理:行动呼吁。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.020. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
2
Multidisciplinary teamwork approach in labor and delivery and electronic fetal monitoring education: a medical-legal perspective.产时及电子胎儿监护教育中的多学科团队协作方法:医学法律视角
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Apr-Jun;22(2):125-32. doi: 10.1097/01.JPN.0000319099.82543.9f.
3
Obstetric Safety and Quality.产科安全与质量
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):196-206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000918.
4
Standardization of intrapartum management and impact on adverse outcomes.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;54(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31820a033d.
5
Team approach to care in labor and delivery.分娩护理的团队协作方式。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;51(4):666-79. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181899ac2.
6
Perinatal patient safety and quality.围产期患者安全与质量。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011 Apr-Jun;25(2):103-7. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e318215b9e5.
7
Medico-legal autopsies as a source of information to improve patient safety.法医解剖作为获取信息以提高患者安全的一个来源。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009 Apr;11 Suppl 1:S76-9. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.108. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
8
Improving safety for children with cardiac disease.提高患有心脏病儿童的安全性。
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:127-32. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001230.
9
Obstetric patient safety: an overview.产科患者安全:概述。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jan;29(1):3-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285828. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
10
Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: applying principles of patient safety.电子胎儿心率监测:应用患者安全原则。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.016. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Discordance between presumed standard of care and actual clinical practice: the example of rubber dam use during root canal treatment in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.假定的护理标准与实际临床实践之间的不一致:以国家基于牙科实践的研究网络中根管治疗期间使用橡皮障为例。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 9;5(12):e009779. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009779.