• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于患者赋权的慢性病管理模式对 2 型糖尿病管理的影响:SINERGIA 计划的效果。

Impact of a chronic care model based on patient empowerment on the management of Type 2 diabetes: effects of the SINERGIA programme.

机构信息

UOS Integrazione Cure Primarie e Specialistiche, Azienda Ospedaliera ICP, Milan Dipartimento di Farmacologia Clinica ed Epidemiologia, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Via Nazionale 66030, Santa Maria Imbaro (CH), Italy.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2011 Jun;28(6):724-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03253.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03253.x
PMID:21294769
Abstract

AIMS

Several chronic care models for diabetes have been implemented in Italy, although conclusive data on their effectiveness are lacking. In the Cusano-Milanino diabetes clinic, patients with Type 2 diabetes with a stable disease/therapy (i.e. a steady level of HbA(1c) without need for therapy changes) are included in the SINERGIA programme: diabetologists, nurses and dietitians empower patients and telemedicine resources are utilized efficiently.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes measured in the year before and after the initiation of SINERGIA were compared. A generalized hierarchical linear regression model for repeated measures was used.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1004 patients were included; baseline characteristics were (mean ± sd): age 66.6 ± 6.2 years, 54.1% male, diabetes duration 10.8 ± 7.7 years, BMI 29.5 ± 4.8 kg/m(2) , HbA(1c) 6.9 ± 0.9% (52 ± 14 mmol/mol); 72.9% of patients were treated with anti-hypertensive drugs; 32.7% were treated with lipid-lowering drugs. After a median follow-up of 12 months (range 6-24 months), the proportion of patients with HbA(1c) ≤ 7.0% (≤ 53 mmol/mol) increased from 32.7 to 45.8% (P<0.0001), while those with HbA(1c) ≥9% (≥75 mmol/mol) decreased from 10.5 to 4.3% (P<0.0001). Patients with LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl (<2.59 mmol/l) increased from 40 to 47% (P <0.0001), while those with LDL cholesterol ≥130 mg/dl (≥3.36 mmol/l) decreased from 26.6 to 19.7%; blood pressure levels were slightly improved. The mean number of face-to-face encounters decreased from (median and range) 2.8 (2.3-3.4) to 2.3 (1.9-2.7) (P<0.0001) visits per patient/year.

CONCLUSIONS

The SINERGIA model is effective in improving metabolic control and major cardiovascular risk factors, while allowing diabetologists to dedicate more time to patients with more acute disease.

摘要

目的

意大利已经实施了几种针对糖尿病的慢性病管理模式,但缺乏关于其有效性的明确数据。在库萨诺-米兰诺糖尿病诊所,将病情/治疗稳定的 2 型糖尿病患者(即 HbA1c 水平稳定,无需改变治疗)纳入 SINERGIA 计划:糖尿病专家、护士和营养师为患者提供支持,并有效利用远程医疗资源。

方法

比较 SINERGIA 启动前后一年的临床结果。使用重复测量的广义分层线性回归模型。

结果

共纳入 1004 例患者;基线特征为(均值±标准差):年龄 66.6±6.2 岁,54.1%为男性,糖尿病病程 10.8±7.7 年,BMI 29.5±4.8kg/m2,HbA1c 6.9±0.9%(52±14mmol/mol);72.9%的患者接受抗高血压药物治疗;32.7%的患者接受降脂药物治疗。中位随访 12 个月(6-24 个月)后,HbA1c≤7.0%(≤53mmol/mol)的患者比例从 32.7%增加到 45.8%(P<0.0001),而 HbA1c≥9%(≥75mmol/mol)的患者比例从 10.5%降至 4.3%(P<0.0001)。LDL 胆固醇<100mg/dl(<2.59mmol/l)的患者比例从 40%增加到 47%(P<0.0001),而 LDL 胆固醇≥130mg/dl(≥3.36mmol/l)的患者比例从 26.6%降至 19.7%;血压水平略有改善。每位患者/年的面对面就诊次数从(中位数和范围)2.8(2.3-3.4)次减少至 2.3(1.9-2.7)次(P<0.0001)。

结论

SINERGIA 模式可有效改善代谢控制和主要心血管危险因素,同时使糖尿病专家有更多时间治疗病情更严重的患者。

相似文献

1
Impact of a chronic care model based on patient empowerment on the management of Type 2 diabetes: effects of the SINERGIA programme.基于患者赋权的慢性病管理模式对 2 型糖尿病管理的影响:SINERGIA 计划的效果。
Diabet Med. 2011 Jun;28(6):724-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03253.x.
2
Optimization of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: beyond basal insulin.2 型糖尿病患者胰岛素治疗的优化:超越基础胰岛素。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):e13-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03586.x.
3
Fasting plasma glucose 6-12 weeks after starting insulin glargine predicts likelihood of treatment success: a pooled analysis.起始甘精胰岛素治疗 6-12 周后的空腹血浆葡萄糖可预测治疗成功的可能性:汇总分析。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):933-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03640.x.
4
Outpatient electronic health records and the clinical care and outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus.门诊电子健康记录与糖尿病患者的临床护理和结局。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):482-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00004.
5
Meta-analysis of individual patient data in randomised trials of self monitoring of blood glucose in people with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes.随机试验中自我监测血糖的个体患者数据的荟萃分析,这些试验对象为未经胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者。
BMJ. 2012 Feb 27;344:e486. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e486.
6
Patient-directed titration for achieving glycaemic goals using a once-daily basal insulin analogue: an assessment of two different fasting plasma glucose targets - the TITRATE study.患者导向的滴定以实现使用每日一次基础胰岛素类似物的血糖目标:两种不同空腹血糖目标的评估 - TITRATE 研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Jun;11(6):623-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01060.x.
7
Mealtime 50/50 basal + prandial insulin analogue mixture with a basal insulin analogue, both plus metformin, in the achievement of target HbA1c and pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multinational, 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison.在2型糖尿病患者中,使用基础胰岛素类似物的餐时50/50基础胰岛素与餐时胰岛素类似物混合制剂,并联合二甲双胍,以实现糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)目标值以及餐前和餐后血糖水平:一项多国、24周、随机、开放标签、平行组对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2349-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.016.
8
Prevalence of injection-meal interval usage and its association with variables of metabolic control in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者注射-进餐间隔的使用情况及其与代谢控制变量的相关性。
Diabet Med. 2011 Feb;28(2):223-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03172.x.
9
Comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 given three times daily or twice daily in combination with metformin versus oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial conducted in russia.在俄罗斯进行的一项为期16周的随机、开放标签、平行组试验:比较每日三次或每日两次给予门冬胰岛素30联合二甲双胍与单用口服抗糖尿病药物治疗2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.017.
10
Outcomes in an Interdisciplinary Diabetes Clinic in Rural Primary Care.农村基层医疗中跨学科糖尿病诊所的治疗效果
South Med J. 2019 Apr;112(4):205-209. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000960.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.远程医疗在2型糖尿病管理中的有效性:一项系统综述。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Sep 9;12:20503121241271846. doi: 10.1177/20503121241271846. eCollection 2024.
2
Reducing Treatment Burden Among People With Chronic Conditions Using Machine Learning: Viewpoint.使用机器学习减轻慢性病患者的治疗负担:观点
JMIR Biomed Eng. 2022 Feb 10;7(1):e29499. doi: 10.2196/29499.
3
The Impact of Digital Health Interventions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes on Health and Social Care Utilisation and Costs: A Systematic Review.
数字健康干预措施对2型糖尿病管理的影响:对健康和社会护理利用及成本的系统评价
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Mar;7(2):163-173. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00377-9. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
4
Results of a Qualitative Study Aimed at Building a Programme to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in People with Severe Mental Illness.一项旨在构建严重精神疾病患者心血管风险降低计划的定性研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;19(11):6847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116847.
5
Community Health Programs Delivered Through Information and Communications Technology in High-Income Countries: Scoping Review.高收入国家利用信息通信技术开展的社区卫生规划:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 9;24(3):e26515. doi: 10.2196/26515.
6
Defining an enabling environment for those with chronic disease: an integrative review.为慢性病患者定义有利环境:一项综合综述。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Dec 20;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00741-w.
7
Chronic-Care-Management Programs for Multimorbid Patients with Diabetes in Europe: A Scoping Review with the Aim to Identify the Best Practice.欧洲患有糖尿病的多种疾病患者的慢性病管理计划:旨在确定最佳实践的范围综述。
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Nov 9;2021:6657718. doi: 10.1155/2021/6657718. eCollection 2021.
8
Health Beliefs, Self-Care Behaviors and Quality of Life in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病成人患者的健康信念、自我护理行为与生活质量
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2020 Jul 3;28(2):221-229. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2020.19102. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
"It Gave Me Hope" Experiences of Diverse Safety Net Patients in a Group Acupuncture Intervention for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.“它给了我希望”:不同安全网患者在针刺组干预治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变中的体验
Health Equity. 2020 May 22;4(1):225-231. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0004. eCollection 2020.
10
Continuous Glucose Monitoring As a Behavior Modification Tool.持续葡萄糖监测作为一种行为修正工具。
Clin Diabetes. 2020 Apr;38(2):126-131. doi: 10.2337/cd19-0037.