Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(7):1-114. doi: 10.3310/hta15070.
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used for children with cancer and are a major risk factor for bloodstream infection. Early and specific diagnosis of CVC-associated bloodstream infection allows early targeted treatment, reducing the risk of CVC removal and avoiding the operative risks and trauma of reinsertion, but peripheral vein sampling, as used in adults, improves specificity but is not usually acceptable in children.
To improve the detection and treatment of CVC-associated bloodstream infection in children (aged 0-18 years) with cancer admitted with fever.
There were four main studies: (1) evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative molecular method for the detection of bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), based solely on blood samples drawn through the CVC; (2) analysis of the prognostic risk of CVC removal and duration of intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic treatment days in relation to presenting clinical features, blood culture results and bacterial DNA test results; (3) systematic reviews of treatment options for CVC-associated infection and a questionnaire survey of current practice in paediatric oncology centres; (4) evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of different test-treatment strategies to reduce i.v. antibiotic treatment days and unnecessary CVC removals.
(1) The bacterial DNA test detected two-thirds [95% confidence interval (CI) 44% to 83%] of children classified with probable CVC-associated infection - specificity was 88% (95% CI 84% to 92%). Although high bacterial DNA concentrations were associated with subsequent CVC removal and long duration of i.v. antibiotic treatment, the test did not improve the prediction of these outcomes over and above clinical signs of CVC-associated infection combined with blood culture results. (2) High DNA load was predictive of CVC removal and i.v. treatment duration, before blood culture results became available at 48 hours after sampling. (3) There was limited evidence that antibiotic lock treatment reduces the risk of recurrent CVC-associated infection or CVC removal (pooled relative risk 0.7, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.05), but prophylactic use of antimicrobial locks halved the risk of bloodstream infection (pooled incidence rate ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.51). Contrary to this, the national survey of paediatric oncology centres found that locks are being used for treatment rather than prevention and that problems related to the formulation of lock solutions currently impede a shift to their prophylactic use in children. (4) Most i.v. treatment days would be saved by early stopping of treatment for children at low risk of infection.
The accuracy study was limited primarily by the lack of an adequate reference standard, and the main limitation of the series of systematic reviews was the poor quality of included studies and lack of randomised controlled trials of CVC removal or antimicrobial locks for treatment of infection.
There is strong evidence to support the use of antimicrobial locks for prevention of CVC-associated infection; however, few of these studies involved children with cancer. The analysis does not support routine bacterial DNA testing on admission to detect CVC-associated infection, but repeated testing (as a marker of microbial load) should be evaluated in high-risk groups. Further research should determine the effectiveness of antibiotic locks for treating CVC-associated infection.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68138140.
This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 15, No. 7. See the HTA programme website for further project information.
中心静脉导管(CVC)广泛用于癌症患儿,是血流感染的主要危险因素。早期和特异性诊断 CVC 相关性血流感染可早期进行靶向治疗,降低 CVC 移除风险,避免再次插入的手术风险和创伤,但外周静脉取样,如在成人中使用,可提高特异性,但在儿童中通常不可接受。
提高患有癌症且发热的儿童(0-18 岁)的 CVC 相关性血流感染的检测和治疗效果。
主要有四项研究:(1)评估一种基于通过 CVC 抽取的血液样本检测细菌脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)的定量分子方法的诊断准确性;(2)分析在出现临床特征、血培养结果和细菌 DNA 检测结果的情况下,CVC 移除和静脉(iv)抗生素治疗天数的预后风险;(3)对 CVC 相关性感染的治疗选择进行系统评价,并对儿科肿瘤中心的当前实践进行问卷调查;(4)评估不同的测试治疗策略以减少 iv 抗生素治疗天数和不必要的 CVC 移除的临床效果。
(1)细菌 DNA 检测检测到三分之二(95%置信区间(CI)44%至 83%)被归类为可能与 CVC 相关的感染的儿童-特异性为 88%(95%CI 84%至 92%)。尽管高细菌 DNA 浓度与随后的 CVC 移除和较长的 iv 抗生素治疗时间有关,但该检测并未在出现血培养结果之前(在采样后 48 小时)提高对这些结果的预测,超过了 CVC 相关感染的临床体征和血培养结果的联合预测。(2)高 DNA 负荷可预测 CVC 移除和 iv 治疗持续时间,在采样后 48 小时获得血培养结果之前。(3)有有限的证据表明抗生素锁定治疗可降低复发性 CVC 相关性感染或 CVC 移除的风险(汇总相对风险 0.7,95%CI 0.47 至 1.05),但预防性使用抗菌锁定可将血流感染的风险降低一半(汇总发病率比值 0.43,95%CI 0.36 至 0.51)。与此相反,对儿科肿瘤中心的全国性调查发现,锁正在被用于治疗而不是预防,并且目前锁溶液的配方问题阻碍了在儿童中预防性使用。(4)对于低感染风险的儿童,早期停止治疗可以节省大多数 iv 治疗天数。
准确性研究主要受到缺乏适当的参考标准的限制,系统评价系列的主要局限性是纳入研究的质量较差,以及缺乏关于 CVC 移除或抗菌锁治疗感染的随机对照试验。
有强有力的证据支持使用抗菌锁预防 CVC 相关性感染;然而,这些研究中很少涉及癌症患儿。该分析不支持常规在入院时进行细菌 DNA 检测以检测 CVC 相关性感染,但应评估重复检测(作为微生物负荷的标志物)在高危人群中的效果。进一步的研究应确定抗生素锁在治疗 CVC 相关性感染中的有效性。
当前对照试验 ISRCTN68138140。
该项目由英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所卫生技术评估计划资助,将在《卫生技术评估》杂志上全文发表;第 15 卷,第 7 期。请访问 HTA 计划网站以获取有关该项目的进一步信息。