Institute of Health and Welfare Policy, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):1130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Active Support was implemented for the first time in Taiwan in March, 2009. This study aims to evaluate whether the supervisors and front line managers of residential services receiving Active Support Training (AST) caused a positive impact on their users with intellectual disabilities (ID) while comparing this with their counterparts with ID whose residential staff were not being involved in the training. The nonequivalent groups design was used for the evaluation; the participants included 49 residents of 12 community living homes as the experimental group and 19 residents of another 5 community living homes as the comparative group. The pretest evaluation was conducted before the AST and the post-test and follow-up evaluations were conducted following 4 months and 14 months after the pre-test respectively. The assessment package contained questionnaires relating to domestic engagement, community inclusion, choice, social network, mood scales, challenging behaviors, adaptive behavior and demographic questions among the residents with ID. Within the group, analyses showed that the residents whose staff received AST showed increased levels of choice and adaptive behavior and decreased levels of depression in the post-test and follow up in addition the residents' engagement in domestic activities improved in the follow up. The intervention did not affect the frequency of family contact, community inclusion and challenging behavior among the residents. The residents in the comparative group showed no significant change except the levels of depression decreased comparing follow-up test and post-test. Based on a cross groups comparison of the effect of the intervention among the residents, only a decreased level of depression was found in the post-test results of the both groups. This study suggests Active Support is practicable but only partially effective in Taiwan; thus, conducting an AST Package of Taiwan version is expectable.
积极支持于 2009 年 3 月首次在台湾实施。本研究旨在评估接受积极支持培训(AST)的住宿服务主管和一线经理是否对他们的智障(ID)用户产生了积极影响,同时将其与没有参与培训的 ID 住宿员工进行比较。本研究采用非等组设计进行评估;参与者包括 12 个社区生活之家的 49 名居民作为实验组,另外 5 个社区生活之家的 19 名居民作为对照组。在 AST 之前进行了前测评估,在预测试后 4 个月和 14 个月后分别进行了后测和随访评估。评估包包括与 ID 居民的家庭参与、社区包容、选择、社交网络、情绪量表、挑战性行为、适应行为和人口统计问题相关的问卷。在组内分析中,结果表明,接受 AST 的员工的居民在后测和随访中表现出更高的选择和适应行为水平,以及更低的抑郁水平,此外,居民参与家庭活动的程度在随访中也有所提高。干预措施并没有影响居民的家庭接触频率、社区包容和挑战性行为。对照组的居民除了抑郁水平在随访测试和后测中有所下降外,没有显示出显著变化。基于对两组居民干预效果的跨组比较,仅在后测结果中发现两组居民的抑郁水平有所下降。本研究表明,积极支持在台湾是可行的,但只是部分有效;因此,开展积极支持培训的台湾版方案是值得期待的。