Suddick R P, Harris N O
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1990;1(2):135-51. doi: 10.1177/10454411900010020301.
From antiquity, individuals, tribes, and cultures have sought the abilities of singular individuals to try to heal them or to help them to endure the onslaughts of disease. For thousands of years before recorded history, these services were provided by the medicine man or shaman of the tribe, whose secret treatments were passed from generation to generation by the apprenticeship methods of teaching. For the most part, their therapies were at best palliative and their effects were placebo and psychological in nature. Reliable written records of healing practices began with the ancient Greek civilization about 400 years before Christ. The written recording of rational therapies and practices established the "physician" as one of the premier occupations (or "professions") of ancient Greek society. About 160 years after Christ, the Greek physician Galen began the practice of examining the post-mortem anatomy of various animals and extrapolating his findings in an attempt to understand the structure of the human body. This was the first well-recorded and documented effort in what we, today, would term "biomedical research". While Galen's efforts and written production were massive, his impact on medical practices beyond Greece was minimal due, at least partially, to the lack of mass printing and distribution methods. Ironically, at almost the same time that Galen's complete works were published, Andreas Vesalius of Brussels published the most startling and exquisite book in the history of medicine. Vesalius' De Humani Corporporis Fabrica (1543)2 was a lavish and beautiful exposition of human anatomy. This event, for all intents and purposes, formalized the separation of the science of medicine from its art. We suggest that this event established the division of medicine into two historical streams--the "healers" and the "scientists" (or Streams "H" and "S"). However, even to the present, the biomedical scientists remain dependent on the established institutions of the healers for their very existence and continuity. Very early the dental healers developed as a distinctly separate branch of the H Stream, due to the efficacy and directness of the therapy of tooth extraction and the need for mechanical aptitude for its execution. This was exemplified in the long and successful history of the barber-surgeons, or their earlier equivalents, as therapists in every society on Earth, including the U.S., up to nearly the turn of the 20th century.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
自古以来,个人、部落和文化都在寻求非凡个体的能力,试图治愈他们或帮助他们抵御疾病的侵袭。在有文字记载的历史之前的数千年里,这些服务由部落的巫医或萨满提供,他们的秘密疗法通过师徒相传的教学方法代代相传。在很大程度上,他们的疗法充其量只是缓解症状,其效果本质上是安慰剂效应和心理作用。可靠的治疗方法书面记录始于公元前400年左右的古希腊文明。理性疗法和实践的书面记录使“医生”成为古希腊社会的首要职业(或“专业”)之一。公元160年左右,希腊医生盖伦开始对各种动物进行尸体解剖,并推断他的发现,试图了解人体结构。这是我们今天所说的“生物医学研究”中第一次有详细记录的努力。虽然盖伦的努力和著作数量众多,但他对希腊以外医学实践的影响微乎其微,至少部分原因是缺乏大规模印刷和传播方法。具有讽刺意味的是,几乎在盖伦的全部著作出版的同时,布鲁塞尔的安德烈亚斯·维萨里出版了医学史上最令人震惊和精美的书籍。维萨里的《人体的构造》(1543年)对人体解剖学进行了奢华而精美的阐述。从各方面来看,这一事件使医学科学与医学艺术正式分离。我们认为,这一事件将医学分为两个历史流派——“治疗者”和“科学家”(或流派“H”和“S”)。然而,即使到现在,生物医学科学家的生存和延续仍然依赖于治疗者已建立的机构。很早以前,牙科治疗者就发展成为H流派中一个明显独立的分支,这是由于拔牙疗法的有效性和直接性以及实施该疗法所需的机械技能。这在理发师外科医生或其早期同类作为世界各地包括美国在内的每个社会的治疗者的漫长而成功的历史中得到了体现,直到20世纪之交。(摘要截选至400字)