Suppr超能文献

第33章:运动障碍病史。

Chapter 33: the history of movement disorders.

作者信息

Lanska Douglas J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tomah, WI 54660, USA.

出版信息

Handb Clin Neurol. 2010;95:501-46. doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(08)02133-7.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Role of basal ganglia: Vesalius and Piccolomini distinguished subcortical nuclei from cortex and white matter in the 16th century. Willis' mistaken concept in the late 17th century that the corpus striatum was the seat of motor power persisted for 200 years and formed the basis of mid-19th-century localizations of movement disorders to the striatum (chorea by Broadbent and Jackson, and athetosis by Hammond). By the late 19th century, many movement disorders were described but for most no pathologic correlate was known. Tremor: Descriptions of tremors progressed from Galen's definition in the 2nd century; to Galileo's physiologic tremor in 1610; separation of involuntary movements during action and at rest in the 17th and 18th centuries by de la Boë Sylvius and van Sweiten; description of Parkinson's disease by Parkinson, discrimination of the rest tremor of Parkinson's disease from the intention tremor of multiple sclerosis by Charcot, and recognition of familial action tremors by Dana and others in the late 19th century; and recognition of autosomal dominant essential tremor in the mid-20th century. Parkinsonism: Pathologic changes in Parkinson's disease were recognized in the substantia nigra by Blocq and Marinescu in the late 19th century, and around 1920 Trértiakoff established Lewy bodies in the substantia nigra as a pathologic hallmark while the Vogts instead emphasized pathologic changes in the striatum; it was only in the mid-1960s that a nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway was demonstrated and found to be critical to pathogenesis. Early treatment approaches with anticholinergic medications or crude neurosurgical ablation procedures were eclipsed in the 1960s by the advent of L-DOPA therapy due to the work of Carlsson and colleagues, Birkmayer and Hornykiewicz, Barbeau, and Cotzias. Later progress in understanding and treating Parkinson's disease included recognition of neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism beginning in the 1950s, development of dopamine agonists and elaboration of different dopamine receptors beginning in the 1960s, recognition of MPTP-induced parkinsonism in 1982 and subsequent development of experimental models of MPTP-induced parkinsonism. Since the 1980s, stereotactic neurosurgical ablation procedures such as stereotactic pallidotomy were revisited and improved, and stimulation or ablation procedures that modulate subthalamic nucleus activity were developed. Since 1990, rare genetic forms of Parkinson's disease were discovered, which accelerated progress in understanding pathogenesis, and established roles for alpha synuclein and the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic system. Separation of atypical forms of parkinsonism (e.g. Wilson's disease, multisystem atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration) from Parkinson's disease in the 20th century also led to important discoveries of basal ganglia function, and in the case of Wilson's disease to recognition of genetic mutations and effective treatments. Choreoathetosis: Since the middle ages, the term chorea has been used to describe both organic and psychological disorders of motor control. Paracelcus introduced the concept of chorea as an organic medical condition in the 16th century. Sydenham's description of childhood chorea (1686) was followed by recognition in the 19th and 20th centuries that Sydenham's chorea was a manifestation of rheumatic fever; by the 1930s, rheumatic fever was recognized as a sequel of group A streptococcal pharyngitis, which could be effectively prevented with sulfonamides. Athetosis was described by Hammond (1871) and later linked by him to a malignant growth in the contralateral corpus striatum; nevertheless, athetosis has been controversial and often dismissed as a form of post-hemiplegic chorea or part of a continuum between chorea and dystonia. Huntington's classic description of adult-onset hereditary chorea (1872) was followed a century later by demonstration that Huntington's disease is caused by an unstable CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in the Huntington disease gene on chromosome 4; this triggered a surge in research, development of various animal models, and numerous important discoveries of cell function and disease pathogenesis. Hemiballismus and the subthalamic nucleus: The relationship between a lesion of the subthalamic nucleus of Luys and contralateral hemiballismus was first convincingly demonstrated by Martin in 1927; this led 20 years later to development of an animal model by Whittier and Mettler, who produced experimental hemichorea-hemiballismus in monkeys by lesioning the contralateral subthalamic nucleus. Since the late 1980s, the neurochemistry and neurophysiology of the subthalamic nucleus have been substantially revised with the demonstration that the subthalamic nucleus is not fundamentally inhibitory but instead provides excitatory glutaminergic inputs to the globus pallidus, and appreciation that the subthalamic nucleus serves an important role in both hyperkinetic and hypokinetic movement disorders. Dystonia: Dystonias were often interpreted in psychological or psychiatric terms since the original descriptions of generalized dystonia by Barraquer Roviralta (1897), and familial forms of generalized primary tortion dystonia by Schwalbe (1908) and Oppenheim (1911). Although Oppenheim had first insisted that dystonia was an organic disease, it was only in the late-20th century that an organic framework was firmly established with the identification of genetic mutations in some families with dystonia and with the demonstration that the basal ganglia were often damaged contralateral to acquired hemidystonia. Focal and segmental forms of dystonia, including writer's cramp, other occupational dystonias, and torticollis, were also recognized in the 19th century. Writer's cramp was clearly described in the 1830s by Bell and Kopp, and increasingly recognized in the late 19th century due in part to Solly's influential lectures on "scriviner's palsy" in the 1860s, and to increasing prevalence because of the increase in writing using primitive writing instruments. Myoclonus: In 1903, Lundborg proposed a classification of myoclonus that remains in use, with primary (essential), epileptic, and secondary or symptomatic categories: essential myoclonus was described by Friedrich in 1881; forms of myoclonic epilepsy were described beginning in the late 19th century by West (1861), Unverricht (1891), and Lundberg (1903); and secondary multifocal myoclonus was recognized in a wide variety of disorders beginning in the 1920s. Asterixis was described in patients with hepatic encephalopathy by Adams and Foley in 1949 and found to result from electrically silent pauses in muscle activity, which led to the concept of negative myoclonus in the 1980s. Posthypoxic action myoclonus (Lance-Adams syndrome) was described by Lance and Adams in 1963 and found to incorporate both positive and negative components. Startle syndromes: Early descriptions of pathologic startle syndromes included Beard's description of the jumping Frenchmen of Maine (1878) and Hammond's description of miryachit (1884), both of which may have had psychological origins. In contrast, hyperekplexia or "startle disease" was described in the late 1950s and early 1960s, and genetic forms were later found to result from various mutations affecting glycinergic synapses. Tics: Tic disorders were described by Itard (1825) and Trousseau (1873), but only gained wider recognition in the late 19th century after Charcot presented cases before his classroom audiences and after Gilles de la Tourette's classic description in 1885. Gilles de la Tourette and Charcot initially considered tic disorders and startle syndromes to be similar if not identical, but these disorders were later recognized as distinct. Psychodynamic and psychological theories or etiology gave way in the 1960s to biological theories supporting an important role for dopamine in pathogenesis, particularly with the discovery that neuroleptic medications could be useful in treatment.

CONCLUSION

In the last two centuries, neuroscientists and clinicians contributed greatly to our understanding of basal ganglia anatomy and physiology, as well as to movement disorder semiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention. The development of animal models, and the increasing use of genetic and molecular biological techniques will lead to further advances in the coming years.

摘要

未标注

基底神经节的作用:16世纪,维萨里(Vesalius)和皮科洛米尼(Piccolomini)将皮质下核与皮质和白质区分开来。17世纪末,威利斯(Willis)错误地认为纹状体是运动能力的所在,这一观念持续了200年,并成为19世纪中叶将运动障碍定位于纹状体的基础(布罗德本特(Broadbent)和杰克逊(Jackson)认为舞蹈症与纹状体有关,哈蒙德(Hammond)认为手足徐动症与纹状体有关)。到19世纪末,人们描述了许多运动障碍,但大多数都没有已知的病理关联。震颤:震颤的描述从2世纪盖伦(Galen)的定义开始;到1610年伽利略(Galileo)提出的生理性震颤;17世纪和18世纪,德拉博埃·西尔维乌斯(de la Boë Sylvius)和范·斯维滕(van Sweiten)将动作性和静止性不自主运动区分开来;帕金森(Parkinson)描述了帕金森病,夏科(Charcot)将帕金森病的静止性震颤与多发性硬化的意向性震颤区分开来,19世纪末,达纳(Dana)等人认识到家族性动作性震颤;20世纪中叶,人们认识到常染色体显性遗传性震颤。帕金森症:19世纪末,布洛cq(Blocq)和马里内斯库(Marinescu)在黑质中发现了帕金森病的病理变化,大约在1920年,特里亚科夫(Trértiakoff)在黑质中发现路易小体是病理标志,而沃格ts(Vogts)则强调纹状体的病理变化;直到20世纪60年代中期,才证实黑质纹状体多巴胺能通路并发现其对发病机制至关重要。由于卡尔sson(Carlsson)及其同事、比尔克迈尔(Birkmayer)和霍尼基维茨(Hornykiewicz)、巴博(Barbeau)和科齐as(Cotzias)的工作,20世纪60年代,左旋多巴疗法的出现使抗胆碱能药物或原始神经外科消融手术等早期治疗方法黯然失色。后来在帕金森病理解和治疗方面的进展包括:20世纪50年代开始认识到抗精神病药物引起的帕金森症,20世纪60年代开始开发多巴胺激动剂并阐明不同的多巴胺受体,1982年认识到MPTP诱导的帕金森症以及随后开发MPTP诱导的帕金森症实验模型。自20世纪80年代以来,立体定向神经外科消融手术如立体定向苍白球切开术得到重新审视和改进,并且开发了调节丘脑底核活动的刺激或消融手术。自1990年以来,发现了罕见的帕金森病遗传形式,这加速了对发病机制的理解,并确定了α-突触核蛋白和泛素-蛋白酶体蛋白水解系统的作用。20世纪,将非典型帕金森症形式(如威尔逊病、多系统萎缩、进行性核上性麻痹和皮质基底节变性)与帕金森病区分开来,这也导致了对基底神经节功能的重要发现,就威尔逊病而言,还发现了基因突变并找到了有效治疗方法。舞蹈手足徐动症:从中世纪开始,“舞蹈症”一词就被用来描述运动控制的器质性和心理性障碍。16世纪,帕拉塞尔苏斯(Paracelsus)引入了舞蹈症作为一种器质性疾病的概念。西德纳姆(Sydenham)对儿童舞蹈症的描述(1686年)之后,19世纪和20世纪人们认识到西德纳姆舞蹈症是风湿热的一种表现;到20世纪30年代,风湿热被认为是A组链球菌性咽炎的后遗症,磺胺类药物可以有效预防。哈蒙德(Hammond)(1871年)描述了手足徐动症,后来他将其与对侧纹状体的恶性肿瘤联系起来;然而,手足徐动症一直存在争议,常被视为偏瘫后舞蹈症的一种形式或舞蹈症与肌张力障碍连续体的一部分。亨廷顿(Huntington)对成人发病的遗传性舞蹈症的经典描述(1872年)之后,一个世纪后证明亨廷顿病是由4号染色体上亨廷顿病基因中不稳定的CAG三核苷酸重复扩增引起的;这引发了研究热潮,开发了各种动物模型,并对细胞功能和疾病发病机制有了许多重要发现。偏身投掷症与丘脑底核:1927年,马丁(Martin)首次令人信服地证明了路易(Luys)丘脑底核损伤与对侧偏身投掷症之间的关系;20年后,惠蒂尔(Whittier)和梅特勒(Mettler)开发了一种动物模型,他们通过损伤对侧丘脑底核在猴子身上产生了实验性偏侧舞蹈症-偏身投掷症。自20世纪80年代末以来,丘脑底核的神经化学和神经生理学有了重大修订,证明丘脑底核本质上不是抑制性的,而是向苍白球提供兴奋性谷氨酸能输入,并认识到丘脑底核在运动亢进和运动减退性运动障碍中都起着重要作用。肌张力障碍:自从巴拉quer罗维拉尔塔(Barraquer Roviralta)(1897年)对全身性肌张力障碍进行最初描述,以及施瓦尔be(Schwalbe)(1908年)和奥ppenheim(1911年)对家族性全身性原发性扭转肌张力障碍进行描述以来,肌张力障碍常常从心理或精神角度进行解释。尽管奥ppenheim最初坚持认为肌张力障碍是一种器质性疾病,但直到20世纪末,随着在一些肌张力障碍家族中发现基因突变,以及证明基底神经节在后天性偏侧肌张力障碍对侧经常受损后,才牢固地建立了器质性框架。19世纪也认识到了局限性和节段性肌张力障碍形式,包括书写痉挛、其他职业性肌张力障碍和斜颈。19世纪30年代,贝尔(Bell)和科普(Kopp)清楚地描述了书写痉挛,19世纪末,书写痉挛越来越受到认可,部分原因是索利(Solly)在19世纪60年代关于“抄写员麻痹”的有影响力的讲座,以及由于使用原始书写工具书写的增加导致患病率上升。肌阵挛:1903年,伦德borg(Lundborg)提出了一种肌阵挛分类方法,至今仍在使用,分为原发性(特发性)、癫痫性和继发性或症状性类别:1881年,弗里德里希(Friedrich)描述了特发性肌阵挛;19世纪末开始描述各种形式的肌阵挛性癫痫,由韦斯特(West)(1861年)、翁弗里希特(Unverricht)(1891年)和伦德berg(Lundberg)(1903年)进行;20世纪20年代开始,在各种疾病中认识到继发性多灶性肌阵挛。1949年,亚当斯(Adams)和福利(Foley)在肝性脑病患者中描述了扑翼样震颤,并发现其是由肌肉活动中的电静息期引起的,这导致了20世纪80年代负性肌阵挛的概念。1963年,兰斯(Lance)和亚当斯(Adams)描述了缺氧后动作性肌阵挛(兰斯-亚当斯综合征),并发现其包含正性和负性成分。惊吓综合征:病理性惊吓综合征的早期描述包括比尔德(Beard)对缅因州跳跃法国人(1878年)的描述和哈蒙德对米里亚奇特(1884年)的描述,两者可能都有心理根源。相比之下,20世纪50年代末和60年代初描述了僵人综合征或“惊吓病”,后来发现遗传形式是由影响甘氨酸能突触的各种突变引起的。抽动:伊塔尔(Itard)(1825年)和特鲁索(Trousseau)(1873年)描述了抽动障碍,但直到19世纪末,在夏科在课堂上展示病例之后以及1885年吉勒斯·德拉·图雷特(Gilles de la Tourette)进行经典描述之后,才得到更广泛的认可。吉勒斯·德拉·图雷特和夏科最初认为抽动障碍和惊吓综合征即使不完全相同也很相似,但后来这些障碍被认为是不同的。20世纪60年代,心理动力学和心理学病因理论让位于支持多巴胺在发病机制中起重要作用的生物学理论,特别是发现抗精神病药物在治疗中可能有用。

结论

在过去的两个世纪里,神经科学家和临床医生为我们对基底神经节解剖学和生理学的理解,以及对运动障碍的症状学、病理生理学、治疗和预防做出了巨大贡献。动物模型的发展以及遗传和分子生物学技术的日益应用将在未来几年带来进一步的进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验