Suppr超能文献

心外膜消融治疗室性心动过速后新发心房颤动的发生率、危险因素和后果。

Incidence, risk factors, and consequences of new-onset atrial fibrillation following epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology/Electrophysiology, University of Virginia, PO Box 800679, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

出版信息

Europace. 2011 Apr;13(4):548-54. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur017. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We sought to determine the incidence, predictors, and consequences of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) following epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 41 patients with no prior history of AF underwent epicardial VT ablation via a percutaneous subxiphoid approach. All patients were monitored continuously for 3 days following ablation and then via implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) or Holter monitoring. Mean age was 70.0 ± 11.3 years and mean ejection fraction was 30.3 ± 16.6%. In seven (17%) patients, the right ventricle (RV) was punctured during access with subsequent needle withdrawal without requiring surgical repair. Thirty patients (73%) were treated with amiodarone following ablation. Post-ablation, eight (19.5%) patients had documented new-onset AF within 7 days. All AF patients had clinical symptoms of pericarditis. One patient with AF was maintained on amiodarone post-procedure. Complications of AF included three patients who received inappropriate ICD shocks and one patient who developed a large, left atrial appendage clot. Acutely, all patients responded to short-term medical therapy or electrical cardioversion. At 18.0 ± 9.0 months of follow-up, no patient had recurrence of AF, and all were off antiarrhythmic drugs. One patient had typical atrial flutter requiring catheter ablation. Risk factors for AF included lack of amiodarone immediately after ablation (12.5 vs. 87.9%, P < 0.001), RV puncture (50.0 vs. 9.1%, P = 0.02), and epicardial ablation time >10 min (62.5 vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial fibrillation after epicardial ablation is common and can lead to ICD shocks and atrial thrombus formation. Short-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy and ICD reprogramming should be considered after epicardial VT ablation.

摘要

引言

我们旨在确定心外膜室性心动过速(VT)消融术后新发心房颤动(AF)的发生率、预测因素和后果。

方法和结果

共有 41 例无 AF 既往史的患者通过经皮剑突下入路行心外膜 VT 消融术。所有患者在消融后连续监测 3 天,然后通过植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)或动态心电图监测。平均年龄为 70.0±11.3 岁,平均射血分数为 30.3±16.6%。7 例(17%)患者在经皮穿刺过程中穿刺右心室(RV),随后无需手术修复即可退出穿刺针。30 例(73%)患者在消融后接受胺碘酮治疗。消融后 7 天内,8 例(19.5%)患者有新发生的 AF 记录。所有 AF 患者均有心包炎的临床症状。1 例 AF 患者术后继续服用胺碘酮。AF 的并发症包括 3 例患者接受了不适当的 ICD 电击,1 例患者发生了左心耳大血栓。所有患者均对短期药物治疗或电复律有反应。在 18.0±9.0 个月的随访中,无患者复发 AF,所有患者均停用抗心律失常药物。1 例患者发生典型的房扑,需行导管消融术。AF 的危险因素包括消融后即刻未使用胺碘酮(12.5%比 87.9%,P<0.001)、RV 穿刺(50.0%比 9.1%,P=0.02)和心外膜消融时间>10 min(62.5%比 3.0%,P<0.001)。

结论

心外膜消融术后 AF 很常见,可导致 ICD 电击和心房血栓形成。心外膜 VT 消融术后应考虑短期抗心律失常药物治疗和 ICD 重新程控。

相似文献

8
Significance and clinical characteristics of atrial fibrillation post epicardial access.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;48(2):141-146. doi: 10.1007/s10840-016-0215-5. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

5
Significance and clinical characteristics of atrial fibrillation post epicardial access.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;48(2):141-146. doi: 10.1007/s10840-016-0215-5. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Learn Epicardial Intervention Techniques in Electrophysiology.
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2010 Mar;2(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2009.11.009.
2
Recognition and Prevention of Complications During Epicardial Ablation.
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2010 Mar;2(1):127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2009.11.012.
10
Antiarrhythmics After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (5A Study).心房颤动消融术后抗心律失常药物治疗(5A研究)
Circulation. 2009 Sep 22;120(12):1036-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839639. Epub 2009 Sep 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验