Suppr超能文献

坎地沙坦与咪达普利治疗高血压:评估抗 AT1 受体自身抗体作用的随机研究。

Candesartan versus imidapril in hypertension: a randomised study to assess effects of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies.

机构信息

Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.

出版信息

Heart. 2011 Mar;97(6):479-84. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.192104. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 (AT1 receptor) autoantibodies have previously been shown in sera of hypertensive patients. This study assessed whether anti-AT1-receptor autoantibody in serum is correlated with the efficacy of an AT1-receptor blocker (ARB; candesartan)-based regimen in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of treatment.

DESIGN

The Study of Optimal Treatment in Hypertensive Patients with Anti-AT1-Receptor Autoantibodies is a multicentre, randomised, blinded endpoint, open-label, parallel-group comparison clinical trial conducted in five centres in Wuhan, China. Treatment is designed as stepwise added-on therapy to reduce blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg. 512 patients with moderate to severe primary hypertension were randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment with either ARB (candesartan)-based regimen (n=257) or ACE inhibitor (imidapril)-based regimen (n=255).

RESULTS

Systolic and diastolic BP was reduced significantly in both treatment groups. The candesartan-based regimen achieved a significantly greater systolic BP reduction than imdapril (30.8 ± 10.3 vs 28.8 ± 10.3 mm Hg, p = 0.023). In those anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-positive hypertensive patients, the mean systolic BP at baseline was higher than in the anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-negative group (160.5 ± 16.5 vs 156.2 ± 17.7 mm Hg; p = 0.006). The mean BP reduction was greater in the candesartan-based regimen than the imidapril-based regimen (-35.4 ± 9.8/16.9 ± 6.9 vs -29.4 ± 9.8/14.2 ± 6.9 mm Hg; p = 0.000 and 0.002, respectively), and more patients on imidapril required add-on medications to achieve BP control (94% vs 86%; p=0.03). No correlation was observed between the titre of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody and the efficacy of candesartan-based therapy. In those anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-negative patients similar BP lowering was reached in the candesartan and the imidapril-based regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

An ARB-based regimen is more effective in BP lowering than an ACE inhibitor-based regimen in the presence of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies. Trial registration number This trial has been registered at http://www.register.clinicaltrials.gov/ (identifier: NCT00360763).

摘要

背景

先前已在高血压患者的血清中发现了抗血管紧张素 II 受体亚型 1(AT1 受体)自身抗体。本研究评估了血清中的抗 AT1 受体自身抗体是否与高血压患者接受 8 周 AT1 受体阻滞剂(坎地沙坦)治疗后的疗效相关。

设计

本研究是一项在中国武汉的五家中心进行的多中心、随机、盲终点、开放标签、平行组比较临床试验,旨在研究抗 AT1 受体自身抗体阳性的高血压患者的最佳治疗方案。该研究设计为逐步添加降压治疗,将血压(BP)<140/90mmHg。共纳入 512 名中重度原发性高血压患者,随机分为接受 8 周坎地沙坦(n=257)或依那普利(依那普利)(n=255)治疗的两组。

结果

两组治疗均显著降低收缩压和舒张压。坎地沙坦组的收缩压降低幅度明显大于依那普利组(30.8±10.3 vs 28.8±10.3mmHg,p=0.023)。在抗 AT1 受体自身抗体阳性的高血压患者中,基线时的平均收缩压高于抗 AT1 受体自身抗体阴性组(160.5±16.5 vs 156.2±17.7mmHg;p=0.006)。坎地沙坦组的平均血压降低幅度大于依那普利组(-35.4±9.8/16.9±6.9 vs -29.4±9.8/14.2±6.9mmHg;p=0.000 和 0.002),需要添加药物控制血压的依那普利组患者比例更高(94% vs 86%;p=0.03)。抗 AT1 受体自身抗体的滴度与坎地沙坦治疗的疗效之间未观察到相关性。在抗 AT1 受体自身抗体阴性的患者中,坎地沙坦和依那普利组的血压降低程度相似。

结论

在存在抗 AT1 受体自身抗体的情况下,ARB 为基础的治疗方案比 ACEI 为基础的治疗方案更有效降低血压。试验注册号 本试验已在 http://www.register.clinicaltrials.gov/(标识符:NCT00360763)注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验