Palma Gámiz José Luis, Pêgo Mariano, Contreras Emilio Márquez, Anglada Montserrat Pujol, Martínez Josefina Oliván, Esquerra Eduardo Alegría, Sagastagoitia Gorostiza José Domingo
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Ther. 2006 Dec;28(12):2040-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.006.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the annhypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor imidapril and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist candesartan in mild to moderate essential hypertension.
The trial was conducted at 8 centers across Portugal and Spain (the Iberian Multicenter Imidapril Study on Hypertension [IMISH] Study Group). Patients aged between 30 and 70 years with essential hypertension were eligible. Following a 2- to 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive imidapril at doses of up to 20 mg/d, or candesartan at doses up to 16 mg/d, once daily in a double-blind, parallel-group design with a 12-week active-treatment period. To achieve the target systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) of <140/<90 mm Hg, imidapril was titrated from 5 to 20 mg/d and candesartan was titrated from 4 to 16 mg/d. The main end point was the change from baseline in sitting blood pressure (BP) at trough. Secondary end points were response rate, evaluation of SBP and DBP throughout the study, and change of SBP and DBP in subgroup of patients with moderate hypertension, as well as incidence and severity of adverse events related to treatment reported throughout the study.
The intent-to-treat analysis consisted of 122 patients (imidapril group, 60 patients; 32 men, 28 women; mean [SD] age, 54.7 [9.2] years; white race, 59 [99.2%], Hispanic race, 1 [0.8%]; mean [SD] weight, 80.1 [12.8] kg; candesartan group, 62 patients; 36 men, 26 women; mean [SD] age, 53.9 [9.9] years; white race, 62 [100%]; mean [SD] weight, 77.6 [14.1] kg). In the imidapril group, the mean (SD) SBP and DBP were, respectively, 155.7 (10.2) and 96.7 (4.7) mm Hg at baseline and 139.4 (11.9) and 86.9 (7.6) mm Hg at the end of the 12-week treatment period (visit 5); SBP had decreased significantly from baseline, by 10.5% (mean [SD] Delta, -16.3 [12.3] mm Hg [95% CI, -19.5 to -13.1; P < 0.001]) and DBP had decreased significantly, by 10.1% (mean [SD] A, -9.8 [7.8] mm Hg [95% CI, -11.8 to -7.8; P < 0.001]). In the candesartan group, the mean (SD) SBP and DBP values were, respectively, 158.4 [11.2] and 98.3 [4.1] mm Hg at baseline and 139.8 [12.5] and 87.6 7.5] mm Hg at 12 weeks, corresponding to decreases of 11.7% in SBP (mean [SD] A, -18.6 [12.8] mm Hg [95% CI, -21.9 to -15.4; P < 0.001]) and 10.9% in DBP (mean [SD] A, -10.7 [7.3] mm Hg [95% CI, -12.5 to -8.8; P < 0.001]). Response rates were 78.3% (47/60) with imidapril and 69.4% (43/62) with candesartan, and BP normalization (<140/<90 mm Hg) was achieved in 55.0% (33/60) of patients with imidapril and 45.2% (28/62) of patients with candesartan. The incidences of adverse events were similar between groups. Most (73.9%) adverse events were mild in intensity. A serious adverse event (severe anxiety) was reported in the candesartan group and led to study discontinuation. No cases of dry cough or hypotension were reported.
The results of this study suggest that imidapril once daily at doses up to 20 mg and candesartan once daily at doses up to 16 mg were effective in this population of mildly to moderately hypertensive patients. Both treatments were well tolerated.
本研究旨在评估血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂咪达普利和血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂坎地沙坦对轻至中度原发性高血压的降压疗效和耐受性。
该试验在葡萄牙和西班牙的8个中心进行(伊比利亚多中心咪达普利高血压研究[IMISH]研究组)。年龄在30至70岁之间的原发性高血压患者符合条件。在进行2至4周的单盲、安慰剂导入期后,患者被随机分配接受剂量高达20 mg/d的咪达普利,或剂量高达16 mg/d的坎地沙坦,采用双盲、平行组设计,进行为期12周的积极治疗期,每日一次。为达到收缩压/舒张压(SBP/DBP)<140/<90 mmHg的目标,咪达普利从5 mg/d滴定至20 mg/d,坎地沙坦从4 mg/d滴定至16 mg/d。主要终点是谷值时坐位血压(BP)相对于基线的变化。次要终点是缓解率、整个研究过程中SBP和DBP的评估、中度高血压患者亚组中SBP和DBP的变化,以及整个研究过程中报告的与治疗相关的不良事件的发生率和严重程度。
意向性分析包括122例患者(咪达普利组60例患者;男性32例,女性28例;平均[标准差]年龄,54.7[9.2]岁;白种人59例[99.2%],西班牙裔1例[0.8%];平均[标准差]体重,80.1[12.8]kg;坎地沙坦组62例患者;男性36例,女性26例;平均[标准差]年龄,53.9[9.9]岁;白种人62例[100%];平均[标准差]体重,77.6[14.1]kg)。在咪达普利组,基线时平均(标准差)SBP和DBP分别为155.7(10.2)和96.7(4.7)mmHg,在12周治疗期结束时(访视5)分别为139.4(11.9)和86.9(7.6)mmHg;SBP较基线显著降低,降低了10.5%(平均[标准差]变化量,-16.3[12.3]mmHg[95%CI,-19.5至-13.1;P<0.001]),DBP显著降低,降低了10.1%(平均[标准差]变化量,-9.8[7.8]mmHg[95%CI,-11.8至-7.8;P<0.001])。在坎地沙坦组,基线时平均(标准差)SBP和DBP值分别为158.4[11.2]和98.3[4.1]mmHg,12周时分别为139.8[12.5]和87.6[7.5]mmHg,对应SBP降低11.7%(平均[标准差]变化量,-18.6[12.8]mmHg[95%CI,-21.9至-15.4;P<0.001]),DBP降低10.9%(平均[标准差]变化量,-10.7[7.3]mmHg[95%CI,-12.5至-8.8;P<0.001])。咪达普利的缓解率为78.3%(47/60),坎地沙坦为69.4%(43/62),咪达普利组55.0%(33/60)的患者和坎地沙坦组45.2%(28/62)的患者实现了血压正常化(<140/<90 mmHg)。两组间不良事件的发生率相似。大多数(73.9%)不良事件强度为轻度。坎地沙坦组报告了1例严重不良事件(严重焦虑),导致研究中断。未报告干咳或低血压病例。
本研究结果表明,每日一次剂量高达20 mg的咪达普利和每日一次剂量高达16 mg的坎地沙坦对该轻至中度高血压患者群体有效。两种治疗耐受性均良好。