Suppr超能文献

在常规心脏手术中使用自体血回输既无效又不具有成本效益,应仅用于特定病例。

The use of cell salvage in routine cardiac surgery is ineffective and not cost-effective and should be reserved for selected cases.

作者信息

Attaran Saina, McIlroy Daniel, Fabri Brian M, Pullan Mark D

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L18 8FE, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 May;12(5):824-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.249136. Epub 2011 Feb 5.

Abstract

The reported benefits of intraoperative cell salvage are decreased requirement for blood transfusion and cost-effectiveness. This study was designed to challenge this hypothesis. We assessed intraoperative blood loss and the use of cell saver in our institution. In <7% of cases the volume of blood loss was sufficient enough to be washed and returned. We conclude that the routine use of cell savers in all cardiac operations affords no benefit and consumes additional revenue. We recommend that the system only be considered in selected high-risk cases or complex procedures.

摘要

术中血液回收的既定益处是减少输血需求和成本效益。本研究旨在对这一假设提出质疑。我们评估了我们机构的术中失血量和血液回收机的使用情况。在不到7%的病例中,失血量足以进行清洗和回输。我们得出结论,在所有心脏手术中常规使用血液回收机并无益处,反而会消耗额外收入。我们建议仅在选定的高风险病例或复杂手术中考虑使用该系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验