Cancer Prevention Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):85-103. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.1.85.
Taking a representative snapshot of physical activity intervention trial findings published between 1996 and 2006, we empirically evaluated participant characteristics, response and retention rates, and their associations with intervention settings.
A structured database search identified 5 representative health behavior journals, from which 32 research reports of physical activity intervention trials were reviewed. Interventions settings were categorized as workplace, healthcare, home- or community-based. Information on participant and intervention characteristics was extracted and reviewed.
The majority of participants were Caucasian (86%), women (66%), healthy but sedentary (63%), and middle-aged (mean age = 51 years). Intervention response rates ranged from 20% to 89%, with the greatest response rate for healthcare and home-based interventions. Compared with nonparticipants, study participants tended to be women, Caucasian, tertiary-educated, and middle-class. Participants in workplace interventions were younger, more educated, and healthier; in community-based interventions, participants were older and more ethnically diverse. Reporting on education and income was inconsistent. The mean retention rate was 78%, with minimal differences between intervention settings.
These results emphasize the need for physical activity interventions to target men, socioeconomically disadvantaged, and ethnic minority populations. Consistent reporting of response rate and retention may enhance the understanding of which intervention settings best recruit and retain large, representative samples.
本研究采用实证方法评估了 1996 年至 2006 年间发表的身体活动干预试验研究报告中参与者的特征、反应率和保留率,并分析了这些特征与干预环境之间的关联。
通过结构化数据库搜索,我们确定了 5 种具有代表性的健康行为期刊,从这些期刊中我们共查阅了 32 项身体活动干预试验的研究报告。我们将干预环境分为工作场所、医疗保健、家庭或社区。提取并回顾了参与者和干预措施的特征信息。
参与者主要为白人(86%)、女性(66%)、健康但久坐不动(63%)和中年人群(平均年龄为 51 岁)。干预反应率范围为 20%至 89%,其中医疗保健和家庭干预的反应率最高。与非参与者相比,研究参与者往往为女性、白种人、受过高等教育和中产阶级。工作场所干预的参与者更年轻、受教育程度更高、更健康;社区干预的参与者年龄更大、种族更加多样化。关于教育和收入的报告并不一致。平均保留率为 78%,不同干预环境之间差异很小。
这些结果强调了身体活动干预措施需要针对男性、社会经济地位较低和少数民族群体。对反应率和保留率的一致报告可能会增进对哪些干预环境最能招募和保留大量代表性样本的理解。