• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠脉综合征治疗中随机分组后治疗交叉的影响。

The impact of postrandomization crossover of therapy in acute coronary syndromes care.

作者信息

Mahaffey Kenneth W, Pieper Karen S, Lokhnygina Yuliya, Califf Robert M, Antman Elliott M, Kleiman Neal S, Goodman Shaun G, White Harvey D, Rao Sunil V, Hochman Judith S, Cohen Marc, Col Jacques J, Roe Matthew T, Ferguson James J

机构信息

Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27715, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Mar;4(2):211-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.853598. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.853598
PMID:21304094
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization, and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) study, patients assigned enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) were treated with alternative anticoagulant therapy after randomization at physician discretion, a practice made possible because the trial was open label. Using SYNERGY as an example, we demonstrate the difficulty of evaluating the effect of postrandomization events in clinical trials and discuss possible methodology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with and without postrandomization crossovers were characterized and event rates analyzed. Statistical modeling was performed using inverse probability weighting and landmark analyses to evaluate the potential impact of postrandomization crossovers on event rates and treatment effect. Of 9978 SYNERGY patients, 9613 (96.3%) received at least 1 dose of randomized therapy and are included in these analyses. Of these, 740 (7.7%; 554 enoxaparin; 186 UFH) had postrandomization crossover. Crossover patients had higher unadjusted rates of 30-day death/myocardial infarction (MI) (18.9% versus 14.0%), thrombolysis in MI (TIMI) bleeding (16.9% versus 7.6%), Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries bleeding (4.5% versus 2.3%), and transfusions (32.3% versus 15.2%). Adjustment for timing of crossover relative to the events attenuated the difference noted in death/MI but accentuated the association with TIMI bleeding. After adjustment using the inverse probability weighting technique, only a modest difference in the absolute treatment effect was observed between enoxaparin and UFH on death/MI (0.6% [unadjusted] versus 0.8% [adjusted]) and TIMI major bleeding (1.5% [unadjusted] versus 1.0% [adjusted]). The landmark analysis indicated a significant association between crossover from enoxaparin to UFH and TIMI bleeding but not in the other direction, and no crossover association was found in death/MI.

CONCLUSIONS

Postrandomization events in clinical trials are accompanied by substantial confounders that require careful consideration. In SYNERGY, postrandomization crossovers occurred in nearly 10% of patients, abetted by the open-label trial design. These patients had increased incidence of bleeding and death/MI, but after adjustment using several modeling techniques, only a modest impact of postrandomization crossovers on treatment effect was observed. The usual methods of analyzing end points cannot adequately address biases in changing treatment in these patients. The potential biases of membership in a postrandomization subgroup, as well as the methods used to account for the biases, should be considered when weighing the strength of results. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00043784.

摘要

背景

在依诺肝素、血管重建和糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂新策略的卓越疗效(SYNERGY)研究中,随机分组后,分配至依诺肝素或普通肝素(UFH)组的患者可由医生自行决定采用替代抗凝治疗,由于该试验为开放标签设计,这种做法得以实现。以SYNERGY研究为例,我们展示了在临床试验中评估随机分组后事件的效果的困难,并讨论了可能的方法。

方法与结果

对有和没有随机分组后交叉治疗的患者进行特征描述并分析事件发生率。使用逆概率加权和标志性分析进行统计建模,以评估随机分组后交叉治疗对事件发生率和治疗效果的潜在影响。在9978例SYNERGY研究患者中,9613例(96.3%)接受了至少1剂随机治疗并纳入这些分析。其中,740例(7.7%;554例依诺肝素组;186例UFH组)有随机分组后交叉治疗。交叉治疗患者的30天死亡/心肌梗死(MI)未调整发生率更高(18.9%对14.0%)、MI溶栓(TIMI)出血发生率更高(16.9%对7.6%)、全球应用策略开通闭塞冠状动脉(Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries)出血发生率更高(4.5%对2.3%)以及输血发生率更高(32.3%对15.2%)。对交叉治疗相对于事件的时间进行调整后,死亡/MI中观察到的差异有所减弱,但与TIMI出血的关联则更加明显。使用逆概率加权技术进行调整后,依诺肝素和UFH在死亡/MI(0.6%[未调整]对0.8%[调整])和TIMI大出血(1.5%[未调整]对1.0%[调整])方面的绝对治疗效果仅存在适度差异。标志性分析表明,从依诺肝素交叉至UFH与TIMI出血之间存在显著关联,但反之则不然,且在死亡/MI方面未发现交叉关联。

结论

临床试验中的随机分组后事件伴随着大量混杂因素,需要仔细考虑。在SYNERGY研究中,随机分组后交叉治疗发生在近10%的患者中,开放标签试验设计助长了这种情况。这些患者的出血和死亡/MI发生率增加,但在使用几种建模技术进行调整后,仅观察到随机分组后交叉治疗对治疗效果有适度影响。分析终点的常用方法无法充分解决这些患者治疗改变中的偏倚问题。在权衡结果的力度时,应考虑随机分组后亚组成员资格的潜在偏倚以及用于解释偏倚的方法。临床试验注册 - URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00043784。

相似文献

1
The impact of postrandomization crossover of therapy in acute coronary syndromes care.急性冠脉综合征治疗中随机分组后治疗交叉的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Mar;4(2):211-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.853598. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
2
Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial.依诺肝素与普通肝素在非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征高危患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的疗效和安全性比较:依诺肝素、血运重建和糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂新策略(SYNERGY)试验
Am Heart J. 2006 Dec;152(6):1042-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.08.002.
3
Exploring the role of enoxaparin in the management of high-risk patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the SYNERGY trial.探索依诺肝素在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征高危患者管理中的作用:SYNERGY试验。
Am Heart J. 2005 Apr;149(4 Suppl):S81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.023.
4
A subgroup analysis of the impact of prerandomization antithrombin therapy on outcomes in the SYNERGY trial: enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.SYNERGY试验中随机分组前抗凝血酶治疗对结果影响的亚组分析:非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中依诺肝素与普通肝素的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 3;48(7):1346-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.058. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
5
A perspective on trials comparing enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.关于比较依诺肝素与普通肝素治疗非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的试验的观点。
Am Heart J. 2005 Apr;149(4 Suppl):S91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.021.
6
Obesity in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the SYNERGY trial.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的肥胖问题:来自 SYNERGY 试验的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2010 Mar 4;139(2):123-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
7
Safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin in patients who are obese and patients with severe renal impairment: analysis from the ESSENCE and TIMI 11B studies.普通肝素与依诺肝素在肥胖患者和严重肾功能不全患者中的安全性和有效性:来自ESSENCE和TIMI 11B研究的分析。
Am Heart J. 2003 Jul;146(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00121-2.
8
Outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized to enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin: results from the SYNERGY trial.急性冠状动脉综合征老年患者随机接受依诺肝素与普通肝素治疗的结果:SYNERGY试验结果
Eur Heart J. 2008 Aug;29(15):1827-33. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn236. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
9
Effect of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in diabetic patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (ExTRACT-TIMI 25) trial.依诺肝素与普通肝素对急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗-心肌梗死溶栓试验25(ExTRACT-TIMI 25)中糖尿病合并ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效比较
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1078-84, 1084.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.027.
10
Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in the modern era of antithrombotic therapy.在抗血栓治疗的现代时代接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
Am Heart J. 2008 Feb;155(2):239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical pathways and management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS): a Consensus Document from the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO), Italian Society of Cardiology (SIC), Italian Society of Emergency Medicine (SIMEU) and Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE).急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者抗栓治疗的临床路径与管理:来自意大利医院心脏病学家协会(ANMCO)、意大利心脏病学会(SIC)、意大利急诊医学学会(SIMEU)和意大利介入心脏病学会(SICI - GIS)的共识文件
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017 May;19(Suppl D):D130-D150. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/sux013. Epub 2017 May 2.