Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 1;36(23):1977-86. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182011f84.
Retrospective study.
This study analyzed the predictive value of the scoring systems of Bauer, Bauer modified, Tokuhashi, Tokuhashi revised, Tomita, van der Linden, and Sioutos as well as the parameters included in these systems.
Metastases of the spinal column are a common manifestation of advanced cancer. Severe pain, pathologic fracture, and neurologic deficit due to spinal metastases need adequate treatment. Besides oncologic aspects and quality of life, treatment decisions should also include the survival prognosis.
Two hundred fifty-four patients with confirmed spinal metastases were investigated retrospectively (treatment 1998-2006; 62 underwent surgery and 192 had conservative treatment only). Factors related to survival, such as primary tumor, general condition (Karnofsky Performance Status Scale), neurologic deficit, number of spinal and extraspinal bone metastases, visceral metastases, and pathologic fracture, were analyzed. The survival period was calculated from date of diagnosis of the spinal metastases to date of death or last follow-up (minimum follow-up: 12 months). For statistical analysis, univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.
Median overall survival for all patients was 10.6 months. The following factors showed significant influence on survival in multivariate analysis: primary tumor (P < 0.0001), status of visceral metastases (P < 0.0001), and systemic therapy (P < 0.0001). Using the recommended group assignment for each system, only Bauer and Bauer modified showed significant results for the distinction between good, moderate, and poor prognosis. The other systems failed to distinguish significantly between good and moderate prognosis. The hazard ratio of the absolute score of all analyzed systems was, however, statistically significant, with a better score leading to lower risk of death.
According to this analysis, the Bauer and the Bauer modified scores are the most reliable systems for predicting survival. Since the Bauer modified score furthermore consists of only four positive prognostic factors, we emphasize its impact and simplicity.
回顾性研究。
本研究分析了 Bauer、Bauer 改良、Tokuhashi、Tokuhashi 修订、Tomita、van der Linden 和 Sioutos 评分系统以及这些系统中包含的参数的预测价值。
脊柱转移是晚期癌症的常见表现。严重的疼痛、病理性骨折和脊柱转移引起的神经功能缺损需要充分的治疗。除了肿瘤学方面和生活质量外,治疗决策还应包括生存预后。
回顾性调查了 254 例确诊为脊柱转移的患者(治疗时间为 1998-2006 年;192 例仅接受保守治疗,62 例接受手术治疗)。分析与生存相关的因素,如原发肿瘤、一般状况(Karnofsky 表现状态量表)、神经功能缺损、脊柱和脊柱外骨转移的数量、内脏转移和病理性骨折。从脊柱转移的诊断日期到死亡或最后随访日期(最短随访时间:12 个月)计算生存时间。为了进行统计分析,进行了单变量和逐步多变量 Cox 回归分析。
所有患者的中位总生存期为 10.6 个月。多变量分析显示,以下因素对生存有显著影响:原发肿瘤(P<0.0001)、内脏转移状态(P<0.0001)和全身治疗(P<0.0001)。使用每个系统推荐的分组分配,只有 Bauer 和 Bauer 改良在区分良好、中等和不良预后方面显示出显著结果。其他系统未能在良好和中等预后之间进行显著区分。然而,所有分析系统的绝对评分的风险比具有统计学意义,评分越高,死亡风险越低。
根据本分析,Bauer 和 Bauer 改良评分是预测生存的最可靠系统。由于 Bauer 改良评分仅由四个阳性预后因素组成,我们强调其影响和简单性。