Suppr超能文献

利用全球脊柱研究肿瘤组(GSTSG)风险计算器评估脊柱转移瘤患者手术后的生存预测;来自一家三级癌症医院的外部验证。

Assessment of survival prediction after surgery in spinal metastases patients using the Global Spine Study Tumor Group (GSTSG) risk calculator; an external validation from a tertiary cancer hospital.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.

Institute of Orthopedics, Lerdsin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2024 Nov;33(11):4336-4345. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08439-8. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aim to validate the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) score compared to previous prognostic scoring systems in spinal metastasis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2022. The survival prediction was compared between the GSTSG, Tomita Score, Revised Tokuhashi Score, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) Nomogram. Single-variable factors associated with survival rate were analyzed using univariate Cox regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Receiver operating characteristic was used for external validity analysis at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The overall survival rate was reported using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve.

RESULTS

248 spinal metastasis patients were included. The mean age was 59.23 ± 12.55 years. The mean duration of follow-up time was 470.29 ± 441.98 days. The external validity of GSTSG was the highest at all follow-up times (sufficiently accurate AUC > 0.7), which was about the same as SORG at 3 months (both AUC of GSTSG and SORG = 0.76) and higher than modified Tokuhashi and Tomita score at 12 months (AUC of GSTSG = 0.78, SORG = 0.71, Tomita = 0.64, and modified Tokuhashi = 0.61, respectively).

CONCLUSION

From our study, the Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicates that the significant factors related to survival rate are regular analgesic use of weak opioids, lung metastasis, and previous chemotherapy. Compared to other traditional spinal metastases prognostic scoring systems, GSTSG shows the highest AUC for external validity in all follow-up times up to 24 months.

摘要

目的

我们旨在验证全球脊柱肿瘤研究组(GSTSG)评分与既往脊柱转移瘤预后评分系统的相关性。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入 2013 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月的患者。采用单变量 Cox 回归和多变量 Cox 比例风险模型分析与生存率相关的单变量因素。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线对 3、6、12 和 24 个月的外部有效性进行分析。Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线用于报告总生存率。

结果

共纳入 248 例脊柱转移瘤患者,平均年龄为 59.23±12.55 岁,平均随访时间为 470.29±441.98 天。GSTSG 在所有随访时间的外部有效性最高(AUC 足够准确>0.7),在 3 个月时与 SORG 相当(AUC 均为 0.76),在 12 个月时高于改良 Tokuhashi 和 Tomita 评分(GSTSG 的 AUC 为 0.78,SORG 为 0.71,Tomita 为 0.64,改良 Tokuhashi 为 0.61)。

结论

多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,与生存率相关的显著因素是定期使用弱阿片类药物进行镇痛、肺转移和既往化疗。与其他传统脊柱转移瘤预后评分系统相比,GSTSG 在所有随访时间(长达 24 个月)的外部有效性的 AUC 最高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验