Robertsson Stefan, Mohlin Bengt, Thilander Birgit
Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Swed Dent J. 2010;34(4):177-86.
The treatment of the congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisor is a challenge to the dental profession. The demand for optimal orthodontic and prosthetic treatment is high because the condition has an impact on facial aesthetic. The aims of the present study were to determine how different outcome of treatment were perceived by professionals and laypeople and to identify situations that caused dissatisfaction or satisfaction after space closure or tooth replacement. A panel of four groups (patients with missing laterals, parents to these subjects, patients with other malocclusion and general dental practitioners) were included. Sixteen cases with uni- or bilateral missing maxillary lateral incisors, treated with space closure or with prosthetic replacements were presented photographically to the panel. The prosthetic replacements included resin-bonded bridges, porcelain bonded to gold bridges and implants. The panel was asked to rate the overall appearance of the mouth, to rank up to three disturbing features and to rank the most important treatment goals in case of treatment need. An obvious difference between the panel groups was found. The general practitioners were less critical than laypeople in rating the overall appearance. Amongst dentists the tooth colour, the tooth shape and asymmetry were the most disturbing factors whilst laypeople were disturbed by colour, spacing and tooth shape. Half of the dentists did not find any treatment need whilst the corresponding figure amongst laypeople was 19 per cent.When a treatment need was confirmed the most common treatment goals amongst dentists were to change the colour or the shape of the teeth. The laypeople wanted to change the colour, the space condition or the shape of the teeth. The study has shown that professionals and laypeople are of different opinion when rating treatment outcome in cases with missing maxillary laterals. Careful planning to achieve optimal aesthetics should be performed.
先天性上颌侧切牙缺失的治疗对牙科行业来说是一项挑战。由于这种情况会影响面部美观,因此对最佳正畸和修复治疗的需求很高。本研究的目的是确定专业人员和非专业人员如何看待不同的治疗结果,并确定在间隙关闭或牙齿修复后导致不满意或满意的情况。研究纳入了四个小组(侧切牙缺失患者、这些患者的父母、其他错牙合患者和普通牙科医生)。向该小组展示了16例单侧或双侧上颌侧切牙缺失并接受间隙关闭或修复治疗的病例照片。修复体包括树脂粘结桥、烤瓷熔附金属桥和种植牙。要求该小组对口腔的整体外观进行评分,对多达三个令人不安的特征进行排序,并在需要治疗的情况下对最重要的治疗目标进行排序。发现各小组之间存在明显差异。普通牙科医生在评估整体外观时比非专业人员宽容。在牙医中,牙齿颜色、牙齿形状和不对称是最令人不安的因素,而非专业人员则受到颜色、间隙和牙齿形状的困扰。一半的牙医认为不存在任何治疗需求,而非专业人员中的相应比例为19%。当确定存在治疗需求时,牙医中最常见的治疗目标是改变牙齿的颜色或形状。非专业人员希望改变牙齿的颜色、间隙情况或形状。该研究表明,在对上颌侧切牙缺失病例的治疗结果进行评分时,专业人员和非专业人员的意见不同。应进行精心规划以实现最佳美学效果。