Department General Practice and Research Unit of General Medical Practice, Institute of Public Health University of Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Jun;29(2):92-8. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.554271. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
OBJECTIVE. "Motivational interviewing" (MI) has shown to be broadly applicable in the management of behavioural problems and diseases. Only a few studies have evaluated the effect of MI on type 2 diabetes treatment and none has explored the effect of MI on target-driven intensive treatment. METHODS. Patients were cluster-randomized by GPs, who were randomized to training in MI or not. Both groups received training in target-driven intensive treatment of type 2 diabetes. The intervention consisted of a 1½-day residential course in MI with half-day follow-up twice during the first year. Blood samples, case record forms, national registry files, and validated questionnaires from patients were obtained. RESULTS. After one year significantly improved metabolic status measured by HbA1c (p < 0.01) was achieved in both groups. There was no difference between groups. Medication adherence was close to 100% within both treatment groups. GPs in the intervention group did not use more than an average of 1.7 out of three possible MI consultations. CONCLUSION. The study found no effect of MI on metabolic status or on adherence of medication in people with screen detected type 2 diabetes. However, there was a significantly improved metabolic status and excellent medication adherence after one year within both study groups. An explanation may be that GPs in the control group may have taken up core elements of MI, and that GPs trained in MI used less than two out of three planned MI consultations. The five-year follow-up of this study will reveal whether MI has an effect over a longer period.
目的。“动机性访谈”(MI)已被证明在行为问题和疾病的管理中具有广泛的适用性。只有少数研究评估了 MI 对 2 型糖尿病治疗的影响,没有研究探讨 MI 对目标驱动强化治疗的影响。方法。通过全科医生对患者进行聚类随机分组,全科医生随机接受 MI 培训或不接受培训。两组均接受 2 型糖尿病目标驱动强化治疗的培训。干预措施包括为期 1.5 天的 MI 强化培训,第一年进行两次为期半天的后续培训。从患者处获得血样、病历表、国家登记文件和经过验证的问卷。结果。一年后,两组的代谢状态均有显著改善,HbA1c 测量值(p < 0.01)。两组之间没有差异。两组的药物依从性均接近 100%。干预组的全科医生在三次 MI 咨询中平均使用不到 1.7 次。结论。该研究未发现 MI 对筛查出的 2 型糖尿病患者的代谢状态或药物依从性有影响。然而,两组在一年后均有显著改善的代谢状态和良好的药物依从性。一种解释可能是对照组的全科医生可能已经采用了 MI 的核心要素,而接受 MI 培训的全科医生仅使用了计划中的三次 MI 咨询中的不到两次。该研究的五年随访将揭示 MI 是否在更长时间内有效。