eHealth Institute, Department of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Pharmaceutical Department, Region Kalmar County, Building 2, floor 2, County Council Hospital, 391 85, Kalmar, Sweden.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Aug 1;21(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02178-0.
In the treatment of coronary heart disease, secondary prevention goals are still often unmet and poor adherence to prescribed drugs has been suggested as one of the reasons. We aimed to investigate whether pharmaceutical care by a pharmacist at the cardiology clinic trained in motivational interviewing improves clinical outcomes and patient adherence.
This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcomes-blinded trial designed to compare pharmaceutical care follow-up with standard care. After standard follow-up at the cardiology clinic, patients in the intervention group were seen by a clinical pharmacist two to five times as required over seven months. Pharmacists were trained to use motivational interviewing in the consultations and they tailored their support to each patient's clinical needs and beliefs about medicines. The primary study end-point was the proportion of patients who reached the treatment goal for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 12 months after discharge. The key secondary outcome was patient adherence to lipid-lowering therapy at 15 months after discharge, and other secondary outcomes were the effects on patient adherence to other preventive drugs, systolic blood pressure, disease-specific quality of life, and healthcare use.
316 patients were included. The proportion of patients who reached the target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were 37.0% in the intervention group and 44.2% in the control group (P = .263). More intervention than control patients were adherent to cholesterol-lowering drugs (88 vs 77%; P = .033) and aspirin (97 vs 91%; P = .036) but not to beta-blocking agents or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors.
Our intervention had no positive effects on risk factors for CHD, but it increased patient adherence. Further investigation of the intervention process is needed to explore the difference in results between patient adherence and medication effects. Longer follow-up of healthcare use and mortality will determine if the increased adherence per se eventually will have a meaningful effect on patient health.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02102503, 03/04/2014 retrospectively registered.
在冠心病的治疗中,二级预防目标仍然经常无法实现,并且有研究表明,患者对医嘱药物的依从性差是其中一个原因。我们旨在研究经过心脏病学临床药师培训的动机性访谈式药物治疗管理是否能改善临床结局和患者的依从性。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、对照、结局盲法试验,旨在比较药物治疗管理随访与标准治疗。在心脏病学门诊的标准随访之后,干预组的患者在 7 个月内根据需要由临床药师进行 2 至 5 次随访。药师在咨询中接受了动机性访谈的培训,并根据每位患者的临床需求和对药物的信念量身定制支持。主要研究终点是出院后 12 个月时达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇治疗目标的患者比例。关键次要结局是出院后 15 个月时患者对降脂治疗的依从性,其他次要结局是对患者对其他预防药物的依从性、收缩压、疾病特异性生活质量和医疗保健使用的影响。
共纳入 316 例患者。干预组达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的患者比例为 37.0%,对照组为 44.2%(P = .263)。与对照组相比,更多的干预组患者对降脂药物(88%比 77%;P = .033)和阿司匹林(97%比 91%;P = .036)依从,但对β受体阻滞剂或肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂无影响。
我们的干预措施对冠心病的危险因素没有积极影响,但增加了患者的依从性。需要进一步研究干预过程,以探讨患者依从性和药物效果之间结果的差异。对医疗保健使用和死亡率的更长时间随访将确定增加的依从性本身是否最终对患者健康产生有意义的影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02102503,2014 年 3 月 4 日回顾性注册。