Departamento de Ciências Morfológicas, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Paraná, Bloco H79 sala 108, Avenida Colombo, 5790, zip code 87020 900, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Feb;23(2):467-73. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1539-8. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
All methods to detect experimental loss of bone present technique limitations. The sensitivities of image and histological analyses to detect the effects of teriparatide in rats with bone loss after ovariectomy were evaluated. All methods were qualitatively valid.
The standardization of methods to assess bone loss after ovariectomy is crucial to establish the degree of experimental osteoporosis. In general, methods per image or histological techniques are used. To validate these two ways to determine the degree of bone loss in ovariectomized rats, we evaluated the sensitivities of bone densitometry, conventional radiography, and histological analysis of the area occupied by collagen, detecting the effects of teriparatide treatment in the femur of ovariectomized rats with bone loss.
Wistar rats were divided into three groups: a control group, in which the animals were only subjected to laparotomy; an ovariectomized group, in which bilateral removal of the ovaries was performed; and an ovariectomized + teriparatide group, in which bilateral removal of the ovaries was performed, and the animals were treated with 3 μg/100 g/day of teriparatide. Three months following the ovariectomy, bone densitometry, radiographic densitometry, and histological analysis of the area occupied by collagen fibers were carried out in the femur diaphysis.
The bone densitometry revealed 11.2% reduction in femur density; in the conventional radiography, the loss of bone mass was 14.5%, and with the histological analysis, a 40.9% reduction in the area occupied by collagen was detected in the femur diaphysis.
In conclusion, histological analysis could not be quantitatively compared with the methods of bone densitometry and conventional radiography; however, all of these methods were qualitatively valid for assessing the loss of bone stemming from ovariectomy and the therapeutic effect of teriparatide in the prevention of osteoporosis.
所有检测实验性骨丢失的方法都存在技术局限性。评估图像和组织学分析方法检测去卵巢大鼠骨丢失后特立帕肽的效果的敏感性。所有方法在定性上都是有效的。
标准化评估去卵巢后骨丢失的方法对于确定实验性骨质疏松症的程度至关重要。通常使用图像或组织学技术方法。为了验证这两种方法来确定去卵巢大鼠骨丢失的程度,我们评估了骨密度测定、常规放射照相术和胶原面积的组织学分析检测特立帕肽对去卵巢大鼠骨丢失的股骨的治疗效果的敏感性。
将 Wistar 大鼠分为三组:对照组,动物仅接受剖腹术;去卵巢组,双侧卵巢切除;去卵巢+特立帕肽组,双侧卵巢切除,动物用 3 μg/100 g/天特立帕肽治疗。去卵巢 3 个月后,对股骨骨干进行骨密度测定、放射照相密度测定和胶原纤维面积的组织学分析。
骨密度测定显示股骨密度降低 11.2%;常规放射照相术显示骨量丢失 14.5%,组织学分析显示股骨骨干胶原面积减少 40.9%。
总之,组织学分析不能与骨密度测定和常规放射照相术的方法进行定量比较;然而,所有这些方法在定性上都有效,可用于评估去卵巢引起的骨丢失和特立帕肽预防骨质疏松症的治疗效果。