Department of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dis Esophagus. 2011 Aug;24(6):388-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01161.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
Advanced esophageal endoscopic procedures such as stricture dilation, hemostasis tools, and stent placement as well as high-resolution manometry (HRM) interpretation are necessary skills for gastroenterology fellows to obtain during their training. Becoming proficient in these skills may be challenging in light of higher complication rates compared with diagnostic procedures and infrequent opportunities to practice these skills. Our aim was to determine if intensive training during a continuing medical education (CME) course boosts the knowledge and skills of gastroenterology fellows in esophageal diagnostic test interpretation and performance of therapeutic procedures. This was a pretest-posttest design without a control group of a simulation-based, educational intervention in esophageal stricture balloon dilation and HRM interpretation. The participants were 24 gastroenterology fellows from 21 accredited US training programs. This was an intensive CME course held in Las Vegas, Nevada from August 7 to August 9, 2009. The research procedure had two phases. First, the subjects were measured at baseline (pretest) for their knowledge and procedural skill. Second, the fellows received 6 hours of education sessions featuring didactic content, instruction in HRM indications and interpretation, and deliberate practice using an esophageal stricture dilation model. After the intervention, all of the fellows were retested (posttest). A 17-item checklist was developed for the esophageal balloon dilation procedure using relevant sources, expert opinion, and rigorous step-by-step procedures. Nineteen representative HRM swallow studies were obtained from Northwestern's motility lab and formed the pretest and posttest in HRM interpretation. Mean scores on the dilation checklist improved 81% from 39.4% (standard deviation [SD]= 33.4%) at pretest to 71.3% (SD = 29.5%) after simulation training (P < 0.001). HRM mean examination scores increased from 27.2% (SD = 16.4%) to 46.5% (SD = 15.8%), representing a 71% improvement (P < 0.001). Pearson's correlations indicated there was no correlation between pretest performance, medical knowledge measured by United States Medical Licensing Examination examinations, prior clinical experience, or procedural self-confidence and posttest performance of esophageal dilation or HRM interpretation. The education program was rated highly. This study demonstrated that a CME course significantly enhanced the technical skills and knowledge of gastroenterology fellows in esophageal balloon dilation and HRM interpretation. CME courses such as this may be a valuable adjunct to standard fellowship training in gastroenterology.
高级食管内镜检查程序,如狭窄扩张、止血工具和支架放置以及高分辨率测压(HRM)解读,是胃肠病学研究员在培训期间必须掌握的技能。与诊断程序相比,这些技能的并发症发生率更高,而且实践这些技能的机会也很少,因此熟练掌握这些技能可能具有挑战性。我们的目的是确定在继续医学教育(CME)课程中进行强化培训是否可以提高胃肠病学研究员在食管诊断测试解读和治疗程序方面的知识和技能。这是一项没有对照组的模拟教育干预研究,在食管狭窄球囊扩张和 HRM 解读方面进行了一项基于测试前-测试后的设计。参与者是来自 21 个美国认可培训项目的 24 名胃肠病学研究员。这是一个在 2009 年 8 月 7 日至 8 月 9 日在拉斯维加斯举行的强化 CME 课程。研究程序有两个阶段。首先,在基线(测试前)时测量受试者的知识和程序技能。其次,研究员接受 6 小时的教育课程,包括专题讲座、HRM 适应症和解读的指导以及使用食管狭窄扩张模型的刻意练习。干预后,所有的研究员都进行了重新测试(测试后)。使用相关来源、专家意见和严格的逐步程序,为食管球囊扩张程序开发了一份 17 项清单检查表。从西北大学的动力实验室获得了 19 项代表性的 HRM 吞咽研究,并将其作为 HRM 解读的测试前和测试后。扩张检查表的平均分数从 39.4%(标准差[SD]=33.4%)提高到模拟训练后的 71.3%(SD=29.5%)(P<0.001)。HRM 平均检查分数从 27.2%(SD=16.4%)增加到 46.5%(SD=15.8%),提高了 71%(P<0.001)。Pearson 相关性分析表明,食管扩张或 HRM 解读的测试前表现、美国医师执照考试(USMLE)测量的医学知识、先前的临床经验或程序自信与测试后表现之间没有相关性。该教育计划的评价很高。这项研究表明,CME 课程显著提高了胃肠病学研究员在食管球囊扩张和 HRM 解读方面的技术技能和知识。像这样的 CME 课程可能是胃肠病学标准研究员培训的一个有价值的补充。